For those who claim that not supporting General Al Sisi washes your hands from any bloodshed… Here is my humble opinion… In collective decisions, every single individual is responsible for the consequences regardless of deciding for, against and even withholding all together. Thinking that there is any option that makes me less responsible is flawed and I would only be lying to myself. Presently, I am accountable for making the choice to support or not. But since I cannot see the future but God willing I will be part of it, I will be responsible for withdrawing authority if ever abused. Giving General Al Sisi the go ahead to fend of terrorism against civilians makes the most sense to me ONLY with stipulation that PROPER and JUSTIFIABLE actions will be taken to SAVE EVERY HUMAN LIFE WITHOUT PREJUDICE, including protestors on all sides, bystanders, human shields, and even non-threatening enemies, unarmed, subdued, or surrendering. They are normally granted this authority anyway, they are trained and experienced, they are not a rouge element. And most of all, they have not given me any evidence that they will fail to act responsibly, more so the opposite. Is there something I am missing here?
Posted on: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 16:55:00 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015