Formal point to the Efficiency Argument: - that scientists/researchers need the knowledge/competence/education to make new knowledge surface in the World. Yes. However, already entailed by a more cumbersome/heavy expression as the point is a kind base, already given by the research context: * The process of making these theories, i.e., former progress gives added theory strength to future achievements. It should also be commonplace to remark that reading science should inform you of the latest devlopment and the smartest solution to what youre reading, normatively speaking, insofar the science presented really is science and not a document of history and that the science has been carried out properly in being the current, best science. In effect, youre always rewarded in getting informed and updated on a scientific problem, theoretically, in the science being the latest, newest science. Note also on the cutter as matter of decision, settling the score for possible review and confirmation: I hereby declare the Demarcation Problem in Philosophy of Science for solved by this, under The Efficiency Argument! (The Declaration for the Solution to the Problem of Demarcation in Philosophy of Science has taken place 2nd February, 2010.) - Important!
Posted on: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 10:54:26 +0000