Frank Dialogue ...what The Bell Curve did was articulate to the - TopicsExpress



          

Frank Dialogue ...what The Bell Curve did was articulate to the general public, as part of a right wing think tank initiative, that investing in black human capital was a lost cause. The sentiment of that book was an impetus for WHITES to disregard white guilt, and view liberal social initiatives as wasted effort. It wasnt jealousy; it was methodical racism - IN A STRUGGLE FOR RESOURCES. People need to stop viewing racism as some sort of envious hatred. Its a struggle for genetic survival and resources, by the group in power. Just like some say there is a distinction between discrimination and racism - and blacks can do the first but cannot be the second (due to lack of power). The same applies with white American racism. Theres the lower level element revolving around having the most magic. Then theres the institutional element fighting for resources. They are not standing in envy; they want you out of the way. If youre living on a piece of land they want, theyre not standing around envying your magic. They will convince everyone that you dont deserve it through propaganda, isolate you, and TAKE IT from you. The Bell Curve was like that. It was an extension of William Shockleys argument. This is how you rebutt that: https://youtube/watch?v=2ULWzSpX6sk
Posted on: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 03:12:00 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015