Free speech the en­emy of bru­tal mil­i­tant - TopicsExpress



          

Free speech the en­emy of bru­tal mil­i­tant Is­lamists The Daily Telegraph (Sydney), Australia Jan 9, 2015 32 In early June, 1944, one of the largest forces for free­dom ever as­sem­bled stormed the French coast at Nor­mandy to lib­er­ate France from tyran­ni­cal Ger­man oc­cu­pa­tion. A com­bined ef­fort by troops and air sup­port from the UK, the US, Canada, Poland, Cze­choslo­vakia, Greece, Bel­gium, Nor­way, the Nether­lands, New Zealand and Aus­tralia rushed Ger­man strongholds in an at­tack so mas­sive that even now, some seven decades later, bul­lets, hel­mets and other bat­tle equip­ment may still be found on Nor­mandy’s wide beaches. France now faces an­other tyran­ni­cal threat, this time from mil­i­tant Is­lam. Late on Wed­nes­day night, Aus­tralian time, gun­men shout­ing oaths to Al­lah in­vaded the of­fices of the Paris-based satir­i­cal mag­a­zine Char­lie Hebdo and be­gan call­ing out the names of in­di­vid­ual staff mem­bers. They then opened fire, killing 11 peo­ple. Among the dead were a po­lice­man and some of France’s most cel­e­brated car­toon­ists, whose work had ev­i­dently of­fended the at­tack­ers’ in­de­ci­pher­ably evil value sys­tem. The killers then took to the street where they cold-blood­edly ex­e­cuted an­other of­fi­cer, a fel­low Mus­lim, who was shot in the head as he lay prone and in­jured on the ground. As the mur­derer re­treated, he screamed that the Prophet had been “avenged”. That line is wor­thy of fur­ther con­sid­er­a­tion. It refers to il­lus­tra­tions in Char­lie Hebdo that de­pict the Prophet Muham­mad in var­i­ous mock­ing ways. It is dif­fi­cult to un­der­stand the think­ing of some­one who sin­cerely be­lieves that a mere car­toon could be of­fen­sive to a de­ity, yet we have seen other sim­i­lar cat­a­strophic over-re­ac­tions to per­ceived slights against Is­lamic icons and be­liefs. In Syd­ney just three years ago, for ex­am­ple, city streets were taken over by vi­o­lent pro­test­ers who were up­set about a YouTube video made in the US that had no con­nec­tion at all to our city or even our na­tion. On that day, pro­test­ers — in­clud­ing very young chil­dren — car­ried signs read­ing “Be­head all those who in­sult the prophet” and “Our dead are in par­adise, your dead are in hell”. The same bru­tal mind­set ev­i­dent in those protests is shown in the ac­tions of the Paris mur­der­ers. Only by de­grees of out­come were they dif­fer­ent. In Syd­ney, ex­trem­ists called for non-be­liev­ers to be killed. In Paris, they were killed. Just as the free world came to­gether in 1944 to rid France of its Nazi op­pres­sors, so too have free na­tions again ral­lied to the French cause. “Reli­gious to­tal­i­tar­i­an­ism has caused a deadly mu­ta­tion in the heart of Is­lam and we see the tragic con­se­quences in Paris to­day,” said au­thor Sal­man Rushdie, who spent years un­der strict po­lice se­cu­rity af­ter fun­da­men­tal­ist Mus­lims vowed to kill him for what they claimed was a blas­phe­mous book. “I stand with Char­lie Hebdo, as we all must to de­fend the art of satire, which has al­ways been a force for lib­erty and against tyranny, dis­hon­esty and stu­pid­ity.” Aus­tralian Prime Min­is­ter Tony Ab­bott drew par­al­lels with De­cem­ber’s Martin Place siege, which left two in­no­cent Aus­tralians dead. “Paris is an un­speak­able atroc­ity, but it is of a piece with what we saw in Martin Place a cou­ple of weeks ago,” he said. “It’s of a piece with what we saw with the Vic­to­rian po­lice sta­tion a cou­ple of months ago. It’s of a piece with ac­tions that have been per­pe­trated by ex­trem­ist fa­nat­ics in France be­fore.” And US pres­i­dent Barack Obama iden­ti­fied the threat to west­ern val­ues rep­re­sented by what he called a “cow­ardly, evil” at­tack: “The fact that this was an at­tack on jour­nal­ists, at­tack on our free press, also un­der­scores the de­gree to which these ter­ror­ists fear free­dom of speech and free­dom of the press.” Ex­trem­ist Mus­lims, as the New Yorker’s Ge­orge Packer pointed out, de­mand spe­cial ex­emp­tion from west­ern so­ci­ety’s tra­di­tions of free ex­pres­sion. “Is­lam to­day in­cludes a sub­stan­tial mi­nor­ity of be­liev­ers who coun­te­nance, if they don’t ac­tu­ally carry out, a de­gree of vi­o­lence in the ap­pli­ca­tion of their con­vic­tions that is cur­rently unique,” he wrote fol­low­ing the at­tack. “Char­lie Hebdo had been non-de­nom­i­na­tional in its satire, stick­ing its fin­ger into the sen­si­tiv­i­ties of Jews and Chris­tians, too – but only Mus­lims re­sponded with threats and acts of ter­ror­ism.” Their cam­paign of ter­ror, al­though shock­ing and deadly, is des­tined to fail. The west’s power is not just ev­i­dent in mil­i­tary terms, but also in so­cial bonds that unite all free peo­ple. That is why the re­vul­sion to­wards this lat­est atroc­ity is so heart­felt and uni­ver­sal. A clue may be found near
Posted on: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 07:58:47 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015