From a moving picture Gods not dead. Only a real risk tests/reveals the quality of ones belief......... C.S. Lewis. We live in a world of skepticism, where our intellect savors knowledge in our quests for reasons. We (LEAN TO) objectify our intellectualism to reason meaning to our lives. We expressed our thought to the context of our perceptibility, never realizing what we flaunt as our objective reasoning lies only well within the precinct of our intellectual perception(s). There may be a lot more than what we perceived as of now. And the mountains of information no doubt expound what we are and in what we objectify what it is in what we believe to be. But in visualizing the comparison to the gigantic tasks of ongoing intellectual endeavor(s), let alone the Herculean tasks still in store beyond our perception(s), the inquiry of our objectivity may face the challenge of subjective intellect? Fair enough, if this is what we can extract from what need to be extracted from knowledge thereof! But then, the prevailing logical ends to the means of our so called objectivity in understand lives would necessarily narrow down to the subjective reasoning of our intellectual perception ( and to what extent? hangs in the air). This Movie asks “Why Do God allow Evil”? And the answer given was simple, FREE WILL. Our intellectualism rationalizes reason, to reason within the boundaries of our intellect and to believe in the indoctrination of our intellectualism within the precinct of our reasoning(s). We can say Free Will is being exercised to choose so, even here. But the belief (or make believe) that our reasoning of lives erases the very fact that there is a divine being, do not to the closest rationale rationalize intellectual reasoning, if, as long as the notion of the existence of God is an intellectual inquiry, that God do not exist necessitates the same. So much so, if one exercise free will to choose God is dead from (subjectivity we objectify) intellectual reasoning and put forward to be accepted, the exercise of free will to choose God’s not dead from faith cannot be viewed subjectively rational. There was another line that says, “Defending God is not easy but it’s simple”. Would the stance of advocacy that God’s not dead in the absence of confrontation(s), becomes un-perplexed in defending the same upon confrontations? Advocating may be easy but defending may not be that easy. The thin line between giving the answer, ‘God is dead’ and ‘God’s not dead’ may not be difficult to endure. But to make a stand that God’s not dead would surely necessitate courage and trust (God) in the SIMPLE exercise of Free Will.
Posted on: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 05:28:07 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015