GHADAFFI WAS A GOOD MAN FOR AFRICA BUT A BAD LEADER FOR LIBYA Inasmuch as some of us regret what happened or is happening in Libya, and how we hate the West for its hypocrisy let’s not be naïve and emotional to think that International Relations is a game of “love your neighbor as yourself”. A strong nation is like an African adage says, “a bundle of sticks that cannot be easily broken”. If truly Libya were a strong nation under Ghadaffi, its citizens would not have been easily fooled into allowing what is happening to have a leeway, in fact THEY WERE NOT FOOLED, they were WEAK and thought Ghadaffi was VERY POWERFUL for he had all the POWERS in his hands. Another definition of a DICTATOR means, “STRONG LEADER, WEAK PEOPLE” and you can quote me on that. Ask yourself this question, can the American people, the British, the French etc be easily fooled as the Libyans were? The answer is certainly NO! Why? Because in these countries leaders are not DICTATORS and because of this, they (the leaders) are “WEAK and the people are STRONG”. This leads me into coining another definition for a DICTATOR; who is “one refuses to let power go, because he believes no other citizen can rule the nation other than him.” That was Ghadaffi and we know many of them around us. A DICTATOR again is bad leader, because “bad leaders create more followers instead of leaders.” Libya had more followers than leaders. The abscess has been opened and the patient who was pretending is now crying – The OUTPUT that we decry today simply reveals the INPUT that was cooking in the BLACK BOX. If you are expecting a result or output of 10 and you receive something less than 10, it simply means the inputs were numbers that could not amount up to 10. There is no magic about it.
Posted on: Sat, 04 Oct 2014 23:28:47 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015