HEMINGWAY V HAMILTON no obligation to stop for police Appeals List No. SCI 2011 2013 25 Nov 2011. In the matter of an appeal on a question of law pursuant to s 272 of the Criminal Procedure Act… Supreme Court of Melbourne, Common Law Division – Judicial Review and Appeals List No. SCI 2011 2013 on the 25 Nov 2011. Between THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS (ON BEHALF OF STEVEN HEMINGWAY, A POLICE OFFICER) – V - ANDREW HAMILTON. Justice Kaye said it was an ancient principle of the common law that a person not under arrest has NO obligation to stop for police, OR answer their questions. And there is no statute that removes that right. (Mr Hamilton) before being placed under arrest did not have any obligation to stop when requested to do so, or to answer questions asked of him.The conferring of such a power on a police officer would be a substantial detraction from the fundamental freedoms which have been guaranteed to the citizen by the common law for centuries.” – Judge Stephen Kaye – Melbourne Supreme Court ruling 25 November 2011. If you are NOT under arrest you DO NOT have to stop or talk to the police.”You can only ever be apprehended or placed under arrest if you have committed a CRIME. “For there to be a crime there has to be a victim or injured party or a violation of contract?” We have a right and indeed an obligation to stand up and fight against UNJUST and UNLAWFUL acts and laws. “If YOU DONT affirm, assert and enforce your rights and DOMINION – YOU HAVE NONE..
Posted on: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 06:06:41 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015