HERE ARE THE FACTS ON OBAMACAREHERE IS THE TRUTH OF THE SUPREME COURT ABOUT OBAMA CARE...PASS IT ALONG AND KEEP A COPY OF THIS FOR YOURSELF Charlie Blake People of The USA .We are being played as fools. Chief Justice Roberts did not say obamacare was constitutional..read his RULING ..He said that the mandate was NOT Constitutional and that the ONLY WAY THAT the federal government could enforce obamacare is to to enforce it as a tax....WELL here is where the obamacare mandate is unconstitutional..Right when Justice Roberts made that ruling THE ACA should have went BACK to congress and should have been VOTED ON BY EACH MEMBER OF CONGRESS AS A TAX .. IT WAS NOT .. The House did not pass obamacare as a tax..they said that it was NOT a tax..DO NOT BE FOOLS PEOPLE .. OBAMACARE IS ILLEGAL ..ALSO THE ACA Originated in the SENATE and a Tax cannot originate in the Senate..PLUS..OBAMA has unlawfully changed the law by giving exemptions ..HE CANNOT DO THIS ..He is an Alinskite Radical revolutionary and his lap dog Main Stream media Knows the Alinski rules and is REPEATING THE LIE over and over and over again so it becomes the new reality.. JUST BECAUSE YOU HEAR SOMETHING ON THE NEWS DOES NOT MAKE IT ACCURATE .. They are trying so hard to make us all believe that Obamacare is legal AND IT IS NOT LEGAL...Take the IRS to court if THEY try to garnish your bank account when you OPT-OUT ..go to (generation opportunity.org) AND (cchfreedom.org) There will be a chance for class action law suits against the Federal Government but we cannot take them to court until they try to tax us for not having health insurance . PLEASE SHARE THIS. ########################################################################### I READ THIS AND THEN I READ THE FOLLOWING $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Heres the Chief Justices opinion (italics in original): Construing the Commerce Clause to permit Congress to regulate individuals precisely because they are doing nothing would open a new and potentially vast domain to congressional authority. Congress already possesses expansive power to regulate what people do. Upholding the Affordable Care Act under the Commerce Clause would give Congress the same license to regulate what people do not do. The Framers knew the difference between doing something and doing nothing. They gave Congress the power to regulate commerce, not to compel it. Ignoring that distinction would undermine the principle that the Federal Government is a government of limited and enumerated powers. The individual mandate thus cannot be sustained under Congress’s power to “regulate Commerce.” ############################################################################## (b) Such an analysis suggests that the shared responsibilitypayment may for constitutional purposes be considered a tax. Thepayment is not so high that there is really no choice but to buy healthinsurance; the payment is not limited to willful violations, as penal-ties for unlawful acts often are; and the payment is collected solely bythe IRS through the normal means of taxation. Cf. Bailey v. DrexelFurniture Co. , 259 U. S. 20, 3637. None of this is to say that pay-ment is not intended to induce the purchase of health insurance. Butthe mandate need not be read to declare that failing to do so is un-lawful. Neither the Affordable Care Act nor any other law attachesnegative legal consequences to not buying health insurance, beyondrequiring a payment to the IRS. And Congresss choice of language stating that individuals shall obtain insurance or pay a penalty does not require reading §5000A as punishing unlawful conduct. Itmay also be read as imposing a tax on those who go without insur-ance. See New York v. United States , 505 U. S. 144, 169174.Pp. 3540.(c) Even if the mandate may reasonably be characterized as atax, it must still comply with the Direct Tax Clause, which provides:No Capitation, or other direct, Tax shall be laid, unless in Proportionto the Census or Enumeration herein before directed to be taken. Art. I, §9, cl. 4. A tax on going without health insurance is not like acapitation or other direct tax under this Courts precedents. It there-fore need not be apportioned so that each State pays in proportion toits population. Pp. 4041.5. C ################################################################################ So if the penelty IS a tax and the Senate has no authority under the constitution to write the mandate or the ACA, since the penelty is a tax. The ACA, to be constitutional needed to be voted on in the HOUSE again, in order for it to become Constitutional legal, and thus law.
Posted on: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 11:16:32 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015