Has anyone else noticed that Sen. Ted Cruz, one of the (and I use this loosely and sarcastically) voices of liberty , is so transparently corrupt that he opposes net neutrality after taking money from ComCast? To make this more clear, ComCast is one of the companies that sued the federal government to have regulations put into place to end net neutrality. When that didnt work, they literally went out and purchased whole sale a mouth piece senator to try and convince you that the government preventing monopolied control over the number one way Americans communicate is bad. The Internet becoming a protected telecom is not bad. Sen. Cruz being bought by the second biggest lobbying corporation in the country to tell you that protecting the free flow of communication and equal business footing is some how anti liberty is what is actually bad.
Posted on: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 14:43:14 +0000