Heavy research at present - all going extremely well! Here is current thinking - IF we were dealing with Chapter III courts - meaning courts that adhered to and operated under Chapter III of the Commonwealth of Australia courts - then those courts would listen to arguments based on laws created by the Commonwealth of Australia Parliaments and operating inside the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution. Yet that does not seem to be what we are dealing with - or does it? You all know we have worked out that the courts operate through arbitration. This document discusses how the High Court has stated that arbitration does not interfer with Ch III courts because you are deemed to have agreed to step OUT of your Cth jurisdiction and enter a private agreement. As if you knew!! Those private agreements are bound to international arbitration rules of the UN. Specifically treaties that include * General Act of Arbitration for the Pacific Settlement of International Disputes (Geneva, 26 September 1928) Entry into force generally: 16 August 1929 Entry into force for Australia: 19 August 1931 Revised Australian declaration: 15 June 1975 * Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York, 10 June 1958) Entry into force generally: 7 June 1959 Entry into force for Australia: 24 June 1975 and a few others. So IF our courts are bound to the Commonwealth Constitution and the courts of the Australian Government are not - then the question is - what superior document governs them? Answer: The treaties. Start reading the act you are being charged under - find out which treaty it adheres to and search for your rights inside that treaty. Because - the more data we find - the more it appears that the Australian Government is an administration operating solely under UN guidelines.
Posted on: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 07:42:54 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015