Here is another thought, many people deny that God exists because science has not shown any evidence of such a being, but imagine a 2 dimensional object trying to explain to other 2d objects the reality of a 3rd dimension. How do 2d objects measure and comprehend something that is so far from their reality. In the book "Flatland", this concept is discussed. The only way the 2d object sees and comprehends the 3d is when a 3d object comes and takes the 2d object into a 3d world. Many times in the scriptures we are told to pray and talk to God, it seems very likely that our limited 3d perspective stops us from measuring and truly comprehending the 4th dimension, or the fifth and so on. As far as I am aware, science has never measured and recorded the actions of a 4d object or person. So it comes to this, it is not for man to prove if God exists, such an action is impossible do to our limited frame of reference, but it is not impossible for God to prove his existence to us, the scriptures being full of examples of how this is accomplished. It is plausible to believe that one could, using the scientific method, put to test what the scriptures say and prove to themselves if God really exists. When one as done as the scriptures ask and absolutely nothing happens then the logical conclusion is there is no God. But it the scriptures tell us how to prove God, and we ignore the formula for success and we get nothing, is it truly fair to say there is no God, when we have failed to do the experiment correctly?
Posted on: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 18:13:11 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015