High Court Rules legislation must be interpreted consistent with - TopicsExpress



          

High Court Rules legislation must be interpreted consistent with Human Rights Charter. This suggests to me that Owner-onus, which shifts the requirement for defendant to prove their innocents rather than the prosecution to prove guilt, is against our human rights. Infringement forms with stat decs where you have to provide evidence of your innocence (self incrimination) are against our human rights. rightnow.org.au/…/high-court-validates-victorian-hu…/
Posted on: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 10:28:26 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015