Hmmm...very interesting. This article documents its sources. That - TopicsExpress



          

Hmmm...very interesting. This article documents its sources. That inclines me toward believing it to be true. In a remarkable aside, the Church further admits that, “the earliest of the extant manuscripts [of the New Testament], it is true, do not date back beyond the middle of the fourth century AD”– (Catholic Encyclopedia, op. cit., pp. 656-7). That is some 350 years after the time the Church claims that a Jesus Christ walked the sands of Palestine, and here the true story of Christian origins slips into one of the biggest black holes in history. There is, however, a reason why there were no New Testaments until the fourth century: they were not written until then, and here we find evidence of the greatest misrepresentation of all time. It was British-born Flavius Constantinus (Constantine, originally Custennyn or Custennin) (272-337) who authorized the compilation of the writings now called the New Testament. Yes, but what about references to the four Gospels supposedly before the 3rd Century A.D.? For example: What about Tacitus, Roman Historian, who wrote about the persecutions of the early “Christians”? Regarding Tacitus, (Senator and Historian of the Roman Empire) these writings supporting the persecution were mysteriously found in the 15th century in the forests of Germany, following a reward offered by Leo X for old writings, and following a history of forgeries in Catholicism: In any case, there has been serious questions about the integrity of the famous passage about Christians.
Posted on: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 09:35:08 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015