How Islamic Are Muslims? …Daniel Pipes… #FoodforThought Islamic law demands much of Muslims; how successfully do they fulfill its precepts? Fourteen centuries of failure should be a sufficiently thorough experiment! //…Scheherazade S. Rehman and Hossein Askari of Georgetown University provide an answer in a 2010 article, How Islamic are Islamic Countries? In it, they establish the Islamic teachings and then calculate how well these are applied in 208 countries and territories. They posit four separate indices (economics, the law and governance, human and political rights, international relations); then they combine these into a single overall index, which they call the ‘IslamicityIndex’. Perhaps surprisingly, the ten countries that top the list of Islamicity turn out to be, starting at the top, New Zealand, Luxemburg, Ireland, Iceland, Finland, Denmark, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, and the Netherlands. The bottom ten are Mayotte, the West Bank and Gaza, Somalia, the Isle of Man, Eritrea, Sudan, the Channel Islands, Iraq, the Comoros, and Angola. Put differently, none of the top ten Islamic countries has a Muslim-majority, but in seven of the bottom ten, one-half or more of the population is Muslim. The IslamicityIndex helpfully quantifies my two-part theory (as presented in books published more than 30 years ago on slave soldiers and Islam in public life) about Islam and politics: (1) Islams demands are inherently too difficult for Muslim rulers to achieve, alienating Muslim populations from their governments, leading to a wide gulf between rulers and ruled, and to greedy autocrats who disdain their subjects interests. (2) Compounding this problem, since about 1800 Muslims have realized that they lag behind non-Muslims in nearly every sphere of human activity, causing such symptoms as despair, irrationality, conspiracism, and Islamism. Asked about my thesis, Mr. Askari disagrees. In a letter to me, he blames opportunistic religious leaders who have distorted Islamic teachings and have hijacked the religion for their own personal gains. Their greed has enabled oppressive and corrupt rulers to thwart the development of effective institutions, he argues. Finally, colonial and imperial powers have exploited these conditions for their own gains. In other words, he sees an evil triad of religious, political, and Western forces creating a vicious circle that blocks progress. My answer: When presented with the failure of a seemingly noble ideal (Communism, Islamic law), adherents instinctively blame human failure rather than ideals; we must try harder, do better. At a certain point, however, when the goal is never realized, it becomes logical and necessary to blame those ideals themselves. Fourteen centuries of failure should be a sufficiently thorough experiment. Take the specific case of Saudi Arabia: If application of the Wahhabi doctrine for 2½ centuries, a stable government and control of Mecca and Medina for nearly a century, and unearned riches beyond the dreams of avarice still leave the country ranking a miserable #131, how can any society hope to attain Islamic ideals? Askari blames Muslims; I blame Islam. This difference has enormous implications. If Muslims are the culprit, believers have no choice but to continue trying to fulfill Islamic teachings, as they have tried for more than a thousand years. If Islam is the problem, the solution lies in reconsidering the traditional interpretations of the faith and reinterpreting it in ways conducive to successful living. That effort might begin with an exploratory trip to New Zealand…// danielpipes.org/14663/islamic-muslims #WakeupIndia #Nationalism #Islamist #Muslims #Hindu #IndiaFirst #Namo #NarendraModi #IndianGovt #Govt #indianParliament #LokSabha #BJP #ShivSena #IndianMedia #NewsTraders #TimesNow #NDTV #IndianNationalCongress #AAP #Leftists #Marxists #IndianMuslims #Secularism #AamAdmiParty #Sikhs #JaiHind
Posted on: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 07:32:51 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015