How Oyewo Muideen Adekunle Exhibited Forged Documents In The Supreme Court of Nigeria Content 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Forged CCNL Documents 3.0 The Statement of The King On Kwara State Patentees 4.0 Conclusion 1.0 Introduction 1.1 It is on record that Mr. Oyewo Muideen Adekunle (Masquerading Pastor Monday, dismissed ex-staff in CCNL) filed a motion in the Supreme Court of Nigeria on 10th April, 2014 praying The Honourble Justices Of The Apex Court Of The Land not only to adjourn the case between CCNL and Mobil Oil for additional ninety (90) days but also requesting the court to make him an inventor (Plaintiff) in suit number SC./69/2011. 1.2 Mr. Oyewo Muideen Adekunle hired the services of a Professor of Law, Professor Bankole Sodipo from G.O. Sodipo & Co., 27/29 King George V. Road, Onikan, Lagos to help him to persuade the Judges of the Supreme Court of Nigeria so as to make him a second inventor of Anti-Corrosive Special Paint For QIT QAD RP 13522. 2.0 Forged CCNL Documents 2.1 But unfortunately for Mr. Oyewo Muideen Adekunle, he exhibited forged documents of Comandclem Nigeria Limited before the Honourable Justices of the Supreme Court to prove his case. 2.2 One of such documents is the official cash receipt of registration issued to a patentee from Kwara State named Bamigboye Ola Saliu and dated 10th of March, 2008, but without a serial number. 2.3 As a Chartered Accountant with vast knowledge of Fraud Investigation and Auditing, coupled with Sound Legal Knowledge of Financial Transactions, a cash receipt without a serial number is not only a fake receipt but also a forged receipt which is inadmissible as exhibit before a court of competent jurisdiction. 2.4 The case of Mr. Oyewo Muideen Adekunle stands the chance of being dismissed by the Honourable Justice of the Supreme Court of Nigeria on 3rd of November, 2014, because he exhibited a forged official receipt of Comandclem Nigeria Limited to prove his case. 2.5 A forged document is inadmissible as an exhibit before a court of competent jurisdiction because it is designed with a malicious intent to commit fraud. 2.6 The above position of law is supported by Honourable Justice Peter Olabisi Ige: Justice, Court Of Appeal in the case involving Yohanna Dalyop V. The State when he said and I quote him verbatim. Whoever makes any false document or part of a document with intent to cause damage or injury to any person to part with property or to enter into any express or implied contract or with intent to commit fraud or that fraud may be committed, commits forgery, and a false document made wholly or in part by forgery is called a forged document” Per: Justice Peter Olabisi Ige: Justice, Court Of Appeal Suit No: CA/J/234C/07 3.0The Statement Of The King On Kwara State Patentees 3.1 A number of patentees have been defrauded by some ex and dismissed staff of Comandclem Nigeria Limited most especially in Kwara State in the past and in the recent times. 3.2 The above is confirmed by the Chief Executive Officer of Comandclem Nigeria Limited, King Professor CJA Uwemedimo sometimes in April, 2014 in an affidavit when he said and I quote him verbatim. 3.3 (5a) That sometime on or about the year 2010/2011, I discovered that some fraudsters had printed receipt booklets in the name of the 2nd Appellant/Cross Respondent company and were defrauding members of the public on the pretext that they were registering them as investors/patentee with the 2nd Appellant/Cross-Respondent company. 3.4 (5b) That when this came to my knowledge, I wrote a petition to the Commissioner of Police, Kwara State, against the activities of such fraudsters and subsequently ordered that the Kwara State office of the 2nd Appellant/Cross-Respondents office be closed. Annexed hereto and marked ‘Exhibit CC1’ is my aforesaid petition dated the 29th day of August, 2011. 3.5 (6) Paragraphs 7-9 the Affidavit of the Party Sought To Be Joined are denied and he is put to the strictest proof of the facts deposed thereto. In further response to paragraph 7 aforesaid, I state that the Party Sought To Be Joined obtained information on the membership registration list of some registered patentees of the 2nd Appellant/Cross-Respondent company from one Pastor Monday Akpan, a former General Manager of the 2nd Appellant company, who was dismissed on the 7th February 2011 for defrauding the company and for Anti-company activities. Per: King Professor CJA Uwemedimo 4.0 Conclusion 4.1 The prayer of each CCNL Patentee is that a fourteen (14) year old case of patent right infringement allegation against Mobil Oil is concluded this year without any further delay. 4.2 The above statement was supported by the Chief Executive Officer of Comandclem Nigeria Limited, King Professor CJA Uwemedimo sometimes in April, 2014 in an affidavit when he said and I quote him verbatim. “(8) That paragraphs 11-13 of the Affidavit in support of the Application is completely denied and in response thereto, I state that this application is brought in bad faith, as the Party Sought To Be Joined is only motivated by the plot between him and the former General Manager of the 2nd Appellant company, Pastor Monday Akpan, to use this application to unduly delay the hearing of this appeal, and to ultimately frustrate the course of justice in this suit.” Yusuf Nurudeen AAT, ACA. CCNL Marketing manager 07032522248
Posted on: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 11:37:19 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015