I agree with this guy on a few things - but he goes astray after a while. Well, to be honest - I wont stand firm with either creationism or the theories of evolution(anyone who does cannot call themselves a scientist or be sure of their decision). The shit thing about science today is that people assume that the answers are there (The methods of education are responsible for this) Have a look at Darwin, have a look at Einstein even - these were scientists! Expanding their knowledge through research and life dedication - not this bullshit of reading a theory from a textbook and settling for that. Before arguing or agreeing with this guy, you have to be an intellectual and think: Why would chaos create order? Does that law simply classify classic thermodynamics? Just as Newtons laws classify classic mechanics and dont work in the larger picture? Is it possible that there are areas that the given constraining laws dont hold? Evolution along with creation hasnt been observed yes, but natural selection has been to some extent - so has the expansion of the universe - are our methods for tracking backwards accurate? Are we sure that assuming time to be linear is the right way to go about it? Are we sure that our backtracking should follow a line, a logarithmic curve or whatever curve we assumed? Thats how a scientist thinks. Also, I think Ive studied too much Experimental Methods for my own good :/
Posted on: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 16:49:09 +0000