I am displeased with my grade specifically, in that your reasoning for giving me an 87, you cite my lack of, (what was it?) analysis. Though if I had gone deeper into kinesiology, (which I guess is just one such example you posit?) I would have gone over our limit on this paper because believe me I could go much further, and thoroughly deep into what said subject is; as I have made a career of it, in a way, and it is something of a passion of mine. One of the main issues I had was our limit. It restricts our ability to provide the detail you seem to want. This I find troubling as you then ask for more, when I am forced in that constraint, to assume what is sadly not the status quo, a three digit intelligence quotient. If my sentences are not necessarily grammatically incorrect once again I must assume the reader is learned enough, or at minimum, adequately well read and able to discern meaning from what I would not dare qualify as mildly complex structures in our (American mocking of) English. One colossal difference I posit between us is my ability to assume the best in others, not only do I doubt you will try and refute this, but if anything claim it as something of a virtue in your career. I will have you know the only way intelligence is spawned when it is not bred, (or indoctrinated by memorization from a young age) is the assumption, and I insist the expectation of it in others. This is part of my personal philosophy when I coach, may I remind you, children and in this have a certain level of recognized skill. I am only held back by my own adherence to this with my superiors and peers, of whom I am no longer surprised, take great offense thusly. This I once again seem to hold dear, my masochistic view that in all of us lies greatness, and an intelligence that we either choose to accept and grow with, or hide behind the excuse that Someone, may not understand and what one may consider common knowledge must be reduced to elementary complexity; that is to say it may not be (complex). I believe I must choose to injure myself again in the assumption you understand the argument I have just made, I am willing to do so as you have not demonstrably proven yourself to be unable to grasp the way I function. I have been called many things, among them a hypocrite. Ever ready to admit my faults there are many things I do here confirm to you I need broken down, and simplified so that I may Grok them, but still I am hurt, that you would use my most prised weakness to condemn the quality, of the complexity of my work. If it please you, allow me to further admit fault, in that my command of our language is metaphorically, but an egg. Though I believe in all fairness one must acknowledge, my most humble of mandate is greater than most, in that through what may be unnecessary complexity I have the ability to convey my point well; if not too well. Further I would posit the adequacy of my debate immediately responsible for the reaction to it by most I encounter who are not used to seeing others, (or being) treated as one with intelligence. Something I find disturbing, especially in the forum of equality and education I believed all schools to be favorable to even though time and again I find the argument from authority used by those challenged, who should most be qualified to know better.
Posted on: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 04:47:24 +0000