I am of the opinion that there is (statistically speaking), due to the subjectivity of the grading process without question at least a 1 point margin of error associated with the analytical calculation method used in the determination of Armanis numeric grade. So statistically speaking the above comment 1 point shy of all As!! is invalid. If the grade required to achieve an A is equal to (X), it should be stated, A= X (+ or - 1 ). So Armanis numerical grade falls within the (statistically necessary) margin of error. So actually he did get all As. Can I get an Amen?
Posted on: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 17:05:39 +0000