I believe that we can build a chart that will tell us the best cure for any virus and later any illness. There will be more than one cure for each situation so use the one that will kill the virus and do the least damage to human tissue, that’s the best cure. That’s today’s viruses and all the ones to come, here and every planet … wherever there are people or animals. This chart will tell you the best cure for each problem; you still have to make the cures. My part is free but I want credit for my idea so as to make sure my part is free, and I deserve credit because it is my idea. I feel good helping. So anyways here is the medicine idea that I have, I have included sketches to help visualize my idea better for everyone. Everything that exists has its own frequency. Gold has a different frequency than that of silver and a rose pedal has a different frequency than that of a daisy pedal. Every thing that exists has a frequency and its acoustics will affect other things that exist. I want to first build a chart showing all the frequencies decayed or eradicated by other frequency’s acoustics (a chart showing which frequencies antagonize what other frequencies). So when my chart is complete you would be able to look at any frequency value and know what frequencies will antagonize it (look at any virus and know which substance will cure it). However like I said, there will be more than one cure for each situation so use the one that will kill the virus and do the least damage to human tissue. To build the chart first thing we will need is a list of substances that antagonize other substances, like salt water antagonizes iron or how penicillin antagonizes bubonic plague. We can look at viruses frequencies antagonize tissues in our body’s frequencies. Yea first we compile a list of what antagonizes what, and then make the list into numerical value. I believe that starting with a number line we would compare the differences between the two numbers that represent the frequencies of the substances that we know to be antagonized and the one doing the antagonizing. To get the frequency value of things there is a database of things by their frequency value. The purpose is to identify substances found at crime scenes, which is accurate enough to tell you not only if it is blood but specifically whose. Sometimes it’s a specific flower pedal from some specific region, and then they would find a frequency value number to look up in this database from the residue and it would tell you what that frequency is or what in number is close to it. There would have to be a data base to look up things by their frequency value or testing something from a crime scene would just find you a number to a frequency and you would not know what the number is. I’m pretty sure we know the frequency value of a lot of things besides that too. So yea list of things that decay and what decays them, then put into numbers and compared on a number line. I’m thinking that the things compared will have different sized sum amount differences between the frequency value number of that being decayed and the frequency number of what decayed it. This I believe is due to the universes acoustics, causing an algorithm to the chart. If there was no algorithm then all of the differences between the numbers compared would be the same size and the chart would be complete, they will usually be different sized differences. I would like to call the differences,” gaps” on the number line. Next to see our pattern for this chart loosely we would make arches over the gaps on the number line, if there is a small gap then a small arch and a big gap a big arch. The peak values of these arches are points along the pattern, I mean the arches peak values (the highest point of the arches). For better understanding see “scan 1.jpg” attached. The universe is currently at a b flat and this frequency repeats in sequence down the number line with all the other musical frequencies. I anticipate the higher arches will start close to the b flat while the smaller arches away from the b flat, so the peaks of all the arches literally form a waveform above the number line. To help see this better, I have drawn it in “scan 2.jpg”. We are looking for points on the pattern so we wouldn’t have to test everything to know everything’s arches, just points on the pattern. Keeping in mind that is a loose chart until we make the arches exact, we need it to be more precise. The next thing to do is measure decay rates of things close in number to what was antagonized, hopefully three things or more that are antagonized by the antagonizing frequency can be used. Each arch will have a wider side where it comes down then where it starts. To see this better I have attached “scan 3.jpg”. The arch starts at a specific point and as it comes down from the highest point of the arch it will fan out where it antagonizes, antagonizing more than one frequency on the number line. To find the center of the fanned out end of the arches and to make the arches exact, we measure decay rates of what was antagonized and other things we know of that are close in number to the frequency that was antagonized. The samples would be the same volume of each and by measuring the weights of each samples at the end of the decay process, you would have the final weight after decay. Then start the decay process with a timer until you match that weight of when it is decayed and time it. The one with the fastest decay rates will be closest to the middle of the fanned out end of the arch. By comparing the times of decay with the same volume amount of each substance you can mathematically find the most antagonized point. That point is the center of the fanned out end and this is your true arch height for the peak value. (See “scan 4.jpg” for a better look at what I’m explaining) That makes the arches more accurate now as to where their peaks are truly, now the peaks are points to the waveform above the number line that shows the pattern for the peak values. The majority of the time there are actually two arches to each frequency that are different heights going opposite directions; however there are times when they are the same size like at the highest or lowest points in the charts waveform. One arch going to the left and one arch going to the right and like I said usually one arch going to one side would be larger than the other arch; both arches peaks fit to the pattern (see illustration in “scan 5.jpg”). Now your chart is complete when the pattern is found, the arches peaks are points along pattern and you would know all the arches sizes without having to test them. Viruses that are yet to come or viruses now, you will know what would get rid of what and you can use it to get rid of viruses. Look up the frequency of which virus you want to get rid of and the chart shows you all of the frequencies that will get rid of that virus (all of the fanned out arches that come down on that frequency), then of all those things which is best for human tissue as well. Then you look in the database of things by numeric frequency value to see if has been recorded and find out what it is or what’s close to it in frequency value that we know of. Is the substance with the best frequency value readily available and can it be synthesized … hopefully yes, if not move on to the second or third best cure until we do have the best one that’s available. This chart will be accurate for about two and a half billion years, and as the universes acoustics change over time so will the chart. My idea simply tells you the best cure for each virus; if the cure is readily available I don’t know. My idea also explains why the medicine works is because of the acoustics of the medicines frequency in the case of a virus will decay the virus and not damage the human tissue. That’s my chart for viruses and their cures, next is to see how other medicines fit with this chart. We can look at the frequency from a pain killer and compare it to the tissue receiving the pain killer. The frequency of the tissue would not be where the decay happens, but somewhere else like under the arch of what gets decayed by the pain killer. Next compare more pain killers the same way and see where they are on the decay chart used to get rid of viruses. They would have similarities to one another and you won’t need as many examples as the decay chart needed. Then compare medicines that dilate or constrict tissues the same way as the pain killers (by seeing how they fit into the virus cure chart). Once the pattern to the decay chart is complete it would be easier to make the other various charts with medicine. But it is definitely the acoustics of the frequencies of the atoms in the medicines that do what they are needed to do. It wouldn’t take long to do and wouldn’t cost as much as they are spending globally on “trial and error” medicine. We would need a accurate scale with a accurate timer, that would cost hardly what is spent on the trial and error method. This is trying some substance to see what happens, and hopefully it’s something good. If it dose work for what was needed then they mark it down and use it in future references. That is not how it works or why it works. I believe my idea puts more light on medicine and why it works (the medicines acoustics) as well as what to use. If there are any questions please contact me… Thank you for your time I know it is valuable. Tim Hempelman i think this is the most recent version
Posted on: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 08:14:04 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015