I have felt, for nearly a quarter century, that the hoax story was itself a monumental deceit. The man-made crew are very clever; they play both ends against the middle. They switch stories with ease. On the one hand they play coy, saying “Oh, we don’t talk about that”, implying their membership of an exclusive and secretive guild. On the other hand they will, when it suits them, loudly claim authorship of any event; always after its arrival and never with real evidence. It is always a massive deception, a falsehood, a blatant lie. We have witnessed their efforts in the fields; they can never produce anything better than a poor replica. Yet each beautiful, gigantic and gracious event will sooner or later be claimed by one or other of the fraudster crew. And we ourselves are at fault. For many years we have happily accepted their deceits. We have believed, with no evidence other than their hollow claims, in the existence of an anonymous, powerful, skilled hoaxing conspiracy. Many senior and long-term researchers really believe there is significant hoax activity. What nonsense! Shame on us all! What distinguishes this beautiful phenomenon is its exquisite design, its endless capacity for innovation and renewal, its multilayered revelations, its skill in design, geometry and number. HC never refers to any of these. He implies that the impeccable weave of the Basket was simply a random fortuitous accident. He is a fraud and a liar. The fundamental question, the elephant in our living room, the matter that nobody dares mention is: Who designed it? michaelglickmanoncropcircles/blog/the-bishops-cannings-basket/
Posted on: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 23:01:59 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015