I know in going free tomorrow because I gave indication about binary decisions that lead to completion - they just made one, and tried to hide it as a decision of mine. If you use smoke and mirrors to cover up an organizational decision to force hands against will to do organizations will, it is still AN EXPLICIT DECISION TO FORCE HANDS in a binary decision, where organizational authority is responsible. This attempt to cover up their decision with psychological suggestion that what they choose to do puts the burden on ”my agency”, through ” warning me” people will regard their binary decision as my choice is see through... To me and obviously to you. They have made their decision and I will wait until tomorrow to find out if they fix it the only way they can - FREEDOM. you cant create any fear in me so I see things clearly and I see it when people are twisting my situation to make it seem that ”I have the decision as agency” and thus it is ”my responsibility”, when in TRUTH, their attempt to REVERSE AGENCY AND CULPABILITY REGARDING THEIR - AND ONLY THEIR - DECISION, despite the fact that I made the ramifications of the decision that THEY just made, incredibly clear and obvious and binary. I said OVER AND OVER such a decision would mean they would be literally choosing, in a binary, black and white manner, clear and direct, to steal my own hands against my will, to force the issue and burst the bubble to stop their pain inductions. They cannot deceive me, you, not themselves (duh, as only morons who can no longer psychologically manipulate would try to get around the rules by trying to trick me into thinking their decision was mine). BECAUSE THE LAW FORBIDS THIS ORGANIZATION FROM MAKING A DIRECT DECISION TO RE-DRUM, THEY HAVE JUST COME VERY CLOSE, BY BREAKING THEIR LAW AND HAVE TONIGHT TO FREE ME, AS GRACE. laws are very very clear and this doesnt make me an idiot and all of a sudden forget that laws are very very clear, and their culpability and their breached responsibilities and their direct decision-making to create such an outcome is legal guilt. The organization isnt allowed legally to be jack, in ”the shining”, and change the end to make it a tragedy, if innocents with knowledge are the victims, and I cannot ever hold the blade, no matter who they designate to be the victim, and no matter how elaborately they carve the handle THEY CARVE OUT OF ME, TO HOLD IN THEIR ACTIONS. they made a decision that is a direct contradiction to the most important laws that guide their behaviour with regard to manipulating me. No direct shedding of anyone if they have prior 100% certainty of casual chain reaction. they made a DIRECT, INFORMED, KNOWING, FULLY AWARE DECISION to try to carve me into a handle and to hold me against my will while plunging me into innocents.
Posted on: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 02:16:29 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015