I love to study early church history - it shows us the more things change the more they stay the same. There was in the 2nd century church a movement referred to today as Montanism and in the 2nd century as New Prophecy. Most of what is known about it is from its enemies - but it clearly points to a prophetic movement alongside and intermingled with the establishment church. Here is a copy and paste from Wikipedia on Montanism: Montanism From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Montanus redirects here. For other uses, see Montanus (disambiguation). For the unrelated Catholic philosophy emphasizing the authority of the Pope, see Ultramontanism. Montanism, known by its adherents as the New Prophecy, was an early Christian movement of the late 2nd century, later referred to by the name of its founder, Montanus. Although it came to be labelled a heresy, the movement held similar views about the basic tenets of Christian doctrine to those of the wider Christian Church. It was a prophetic movement that called for a reliance on the spontaneity of the Holy Spirit and a more conservative personal ethic. Parallels have been drawn between Montanism and modern-day movements such as Pentecostalism, the charismatic movement, and the New Apostolic Reformation.[1] It originated in Phrygia, a province of Asia Minor, and flourished throughout the region, leading to the movement being referred to elsewhere as Cataphrygian (meaning it was from Phrygia) or simply as Phrygian. It spread rapidly to other regions in the Roman Empire at a time before Christianity was generally tolerated or legal. It persisted in some isolated places into the 6th century. Foundation[edit] Scholars are divided as to when Montanus first began his prophetic activity, having chosen dates varying from c. AD 135 to as late as AD 177.[2][page needed][3] Montanus was a recent convert when he first began prophesying, supposedly during the proconsulate of Gratus in a village in Mysia named Ardabau; no proconsul and village so named have been identified, however.[4] Some accounts claim that before his conversion to Christianity, Montanus was a priest of Apollo or Cybele.[5][a] He believed he was a prophet of God and that the Paraclete spoke through him. Montanus proclaimed the towns of Pepuza and Tymion in west-central Phrygia as the site of the New Jerusalem, making the larger Pepuza his headquarters.[7] Phrygia as a source for this new movement was not arbitrary. Hellenization never fully took root in Phrygia unlike many of the surrounding Eastern regions of the Roman Empire. This sense of difference, while simultaneously having easy access to the rest of the Mediterranean Christian, world encouraged the foundation of this separate sect of Christianity.[8] He had two female colleagues, Prisca (sometimes called Priscilla, the diminutive form of her name) and Maximilla, who likewise claimed the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. Their popularity even exceeded Montanus own.[9] The Three spoke in ecstatic visions and urged their followers to fast and pray, so that they might share these revelations. Their followers claimed they received the prophetic gift from the prophets Quadratus and Ammia of Philadelphia, figures believed to have been part of a line of prophetic succession stretching all the way back to Agabus and the daughters of Philip the Evangelist.[10] In time, the New Prophecy spread from Montanus native Phrygia across the Christian world, to Africa and Gaul. Aftermath[edit] The response to the New Prophecy split the Christian communities, and the more orthodox clergy mostly fought to suppress it. It was believed that the Phrygian prophets were possessed by evil spirits, and both Maximilla and Priscilla were the targets of failed exorcisms.[11] The churches of Asia Minor pronounced the prophecies profane and excommunicated its adherents.[12] Around 177, Apollinarius, Bishop of Hierapolis, presided over a synod which condemned the New Prophecy.[13] The leaders of the churches of Lyons and Vienne in Gaul responded to the New Prophecy in 177. Their decision was communicated to the churches in Asia and Eleuterus, the Bishop of Rome, but it is not known what this consisted of, only that it was prudent and most orthodox.[14] It is likely they called for moderation in dealing with the movement. There was real doubt at Rome, and its bishop (either Eleuterus or Victor I) even wrote letters in support of Montanism, although he was later persuaded by Praxeas to recall them.[15][16] In 193, an anonymous writer found the church at Ancyra in Galatia torn in two, and opposed the false prophecy there.[17] Eventually, Montanist teachings came to be regarded as heresy by the orthodox Church for a number of reasons. Though the clash of basic beliefs between the movement’s proponents and the greater Christian world was likely enough for such conflict to occur, fear of how their non-Christian rulers would see Montanist practices fueled anti-Montanist sentiment.[18] The imperial government carried out sporadic executions of Christians under the reign of Marcus Aurelius, circa 161C.E. – 180 C.E., which coincides with the spread of the Montanism. The movement’s penchant for dramatic public displays by its adherents would have brought much unwanted attention to the still fledgling religion. There was never a uniform excommunication of New Prophecy adherents, and in many places they maintained their standing within the orthodox community. This was the case at Carthage. While not without tension, the church there avoided schism over the issue. There were women prophesying at Carthage, and prophecy was considered a genuine charism. It was the responsibility of the council of elders to test all prophecy and to determine genuine revelation.[19] The best-known defender of the New Prophecy was undoubtedly Tertullian, who believed that the claims of Montanus were genuine beginning c. 207.[20] He believed in the validity of the New Prophecy and admired the movements discipline and ascetic standards. A common misconception is that Tertullian decisively left the orthodox church and joined a separate Montanist sect; in fact, he remained a catholic Christian.[20] Although what became the orthodox Christian church prevailed against Montanism within a few generations, inscriptions in the Tembris valley of northern Phrygia, dated between 249 and 279, openly proclaim their allegiance to the New Prophecy. A letter of Jerome to Marcella, written in 385, refutes the claims of Montanists that had been troubling her.[6] A group of Tertullianists may have continued at Carthage. The anonymous author of Praedestinatus records that a preacher came to Rome in 388 where he made many converts and obtained the use of a church for his congregation on the grounds that the martyrs to whom it was dedicated had been Montanists.[21] He was obliged to flee after the victory of Theodosius I. Augustine records that the Tertullianist group dwindled to almost nothing in his own time, and finally was reconciled to the church and handed over their basilica.[22] It is not certain whether these Tertullianists were in all respects Montanist or not. In the 6th century, on the orders of the emperor Justinian, John of Ephesus led an expedition to Pepuza to destroy the Montanist shrine there, which was based on the tombs of Montanus, Priscilla and Maximilla. Beliefs[edit] Because much of what is known about Montanism comes from anti-Montanist sources, it is difficult to know what they actually believed and how those beliefs differed from the Christian mainstream of the time.[23] One source reports that Montanists claimed their revelation direct from the Holy Spirit could supersede the authority of Jesus or Paul or anyone else.[24] The New Prophecy was also a diverse movement, and what Montanists believed varied by location and time.[25] Montanism was particularly influenced by Johannine literature, especially the Gospel of John and the Apocalypse of John (also known as the Book of Revelation).[26] In Johns Gospel, Jesus promised to send the Paraclete or Holy Spirit, from which Montanists believed their prophets derived inspiration. In the Apocalypse, John was taken by an angel to the top of a mountain where he sees the New Jerusalem descend to earth. Montanus identified this mountain as being located in Phrygia near Pepuza.[27] Followers of the New Prophecy called themselves spiritales (spiritual people) in contrast to their opponents whom they termed psychici (carnal, natural people).[28] Ecstatic prophecy[edit] As the name New Prophecy implied, Montanism was a movement focused around prophecy, specifically the prophecies of the movements founders which were believed to contain the Holy Spirits revelation for the present age.[29] Prophecy itself was not controversial within 2nd-century Christian communities.[30][31] However, the New Prophecy, as described by Eusebius of Caesarea, departed from Church tradition:[32] And he [Montanus] became beside himself, and being suddenly in a sort of frenzy and ecstasy, he raved, and began to babble and utter strange things, prophesying in a manner contrary to the constant custom of the Church handed down by tradition from the beginning.[33] The Montanist prophets did not speak as messengers of God but were described as possessed by God while being unable to resist.[14] A prophetic utterance by Montanus described this possessed state: Lo, the man is as a lyre, and I fly over him as a pick. The man sleepeth, while I watch. Thus, the Phrygians were seen as false prophets because they acted irrationally and were not in control of their senses.[34] In some of his prophecies, Montanus apparently, and somewhat like the oracles of the Greco-Roman world, spoke in the first person as God: I am the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit.[35] Many understood this to be Montanus claiming himself to be God. However, scholars agree that these words of Montanus exemplify the general practice of religious prophets to speak as the passive mouthpieces of the divine, and to claim divine inspiration (similar to modern prophets stating Thus saith the Lord). That practice occurred in Christian as well as in pagan circles with some degree of frequency.[36][37] Other beliefs[edit] Other beliefs and practices (or alleged beliefs and practices) of Montanism are as follows: In On the Resurrection of the Flesh, Tertullian wrote that the Holy Spirit through the New Prophecy cleared up the ambiguities of scripture.[38][39] The new prophecies did not contain new doctrinal content, but mandated strict ethical standards.[40] To the mainstream church, Montanists appeared to believe that the new prophecies superseded and fulfilled the doctrines proclaimed by the Apostles.[14] The power of apostles and prophets to forgive sins.[41] Adherents also believed, as did other Christians, that martyrs and confessors also possessed this power. The orthodox Church believed that God forgave sins through bishops and presbyters (and those martyrs recognized by legitimate ecclesiastical authority).[42] They recognized female bishops and presbyters.[43] Women and girls were forbidden to wear ornaments, and virgins were required to wear veils.[44] An emphasis on ethical rigorism and asceticism. These included prohibitions against remarriage following divorce or the death of a spouse. They also emphasized keeping fasts strictly and added new fasts.[45] Montanus provided salaries for those who preached his doctrine, which the orthodox did not permit.[46] Their prophets dyed their hair, stained their eyelids, and were allowed to play with tables and dice and lend on usury.[citation needed] At that time, dyed hair and eye make-up was used by harlots; the mainstream Church forbade it. The Church also forbade usury. Some of the Montanists were also Quartodeciman (fourteeners), preferring to celebrate Easter on the Hebrew calendar date of 14 Nisan, regardless of what day of the week it landed on. Mainstream Christians held that Easter should be commemorated on the Sunday following 14 Nisan.[47] However, uniformity in this matter had not yet been fully achieved when the Montanist movement began; Polycarp, for example, was a quartodeciman, and St. Irenaeus convinced Victor, then Bishop of Rome, to refrain from making the issue of the date of Easter a divisive one.[48] Later, the Catholic Church established a fixed way of calculating Easter according to the Julian (and later the Gregorian) calendar.
Posted on: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 09:22:35 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015