I question the sanity of many scientific people. If they read something in a certain magazine or journal they will believe it except if it is in the April edition. Even though it is just a story written from a reporters perspective. They simply do not get it. And they salivate about anything that has peer review! Even though EDITORS of peer reviewed journals have said that sometimes it would be just as good to toss the papers down the stairs and publish the one that rolled furthest! (Lancet or BMJ editor said that!) Scathing comments about the process because they see the ridiculousness of it first hand! Here is strong video evidence that angioplasty helped Lori Batchelor and we can easily find a hundred other similar videos about improvements. But these people who buy their opinions in a journal will never openly admit that they can see the improvements. Really SAD. Disingenuous people lying to themselves so that they can be part of the crowd. How come this video be called an anecdote? It is a record of events, same as a result through a telescope or a spectrometer but more accurate. When Galileo saw 4 moons around Jupiter, it changed the world. But that was more of an anecdote than these hundreds of videos from all across the world. https://youtube/watch?v=OQHFvp6WFNo&feature=youtu.be
Posted on: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 21:49:10 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015