I suggest reversing the study. Start with people who believe certain foods increase their inflammation as predicted by the blood type diet. Then double blind them to the foods they consume and survey for inflammatory symptoms and test blood for inflammatory markers. Taking a sample of people and seeing if their cardiac risk goes up relative to the population seems like there is some weakness in the study. It seems that the final line of the article, that there may be some benefit to studying it, was a throw away line after an article de-bunking the diet. Anyway, if you have a test of inflammation Ill submit to the potential discomfort of my hands following eating chicken (or some other control food that I would not know if it contains chicken). Any ideas on what inflammatory test we could use to verify microinflammation?
Posted on: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 06:04:13 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015