I think all of the descriptions are true, on both sides of the column. To go through them one by one: I am broken by sin, but I am healed by Jesus; I am flawed, which means sinful, but I am holy and righteous in Christ; I am sinful, (which is really what most of these are saying) (which is a fact that Atheists rail against); I am dumb (maybe, maybe not); I am weak (sometimes); I am nothing (no, you are made in Gods image). // As for the other piece of paper: I am full of wonder, the Bible says that I am fearfully and wonderfully made; I am smart, yep; great learner: yes; beautiful, yes; have a potential for greatness: yes, in the natural and in the spiritual, in Christ. These and many other positive, negative and neutral qualities belong to every person. And the people here who made the comment that science cannot make non-scientific judgments are correct. They would have to provide numbers, measurements, and observations that dont involve emotions or personal perceptions in order to make descriptions like these. The point of view that those discernments on the right come from is called, Scientism. // Science and religion and not in conflict. It is Christianity and naturalism that are usually in conflict. Those who profess Scientism do not own science (neither do Christians--science belongs to the human race). Most foundational scientists were deists or Christians. biblicalspiritualintellectual.wordpress/
Posted on: Sun, 02 Nov 2014 23:04:42 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015