I think it would be a good idea to have public control over services like domain name and corporation registration, in such a way that it is possible for a person to edit the top level record, and enter their own domain name and corporation names, but ONLY in such a way that everything they do when logged in in this capacity is recorded and publicly viewable, so that way they cannot do anything bad and get away with it. This way, these services can be free, not cost money, but still be secure, and this way any nefarious activities can be corrected (both fixed, and the culprit penalized). Think about this: is there ANY way for a person to make USE of a domain name (URL, website name), when THEY create it (think it up first), WITHOUT depending on a company they have to pay money to, to register it for them? I think the answer is no, and the result of that is this: Whenever anyone creates a new domain name (which is their intellectual property), they MUST sell the rights to that name to a registrar, which means that if the creator cannot pay the registrar, the creator loses that intellectual property. This is what happened with my URL: freeornottobe.org, when I could no longer pay namecheap for it. Now it has been bought by another person (individual or group), and when I sent them an email saying they have unlawful possession of my intellectual property, and they must release it to me or be sued, they told me they would file a suit against me for filing frivolous suit. So my next plan is to send them a presumptive letter, in a manner to challenge the validity of their statements and mine as well. If I am right, they will not be able to disprove the presumptions in the letter... If they are right, but they ignore me, they have agreed by tacit consent to everything in the letter, and in court I can stop them from objecting to those presumptions by invoking estoppel. Then I can move for summary judgement (whatever I requested, that the judge finds reasonable/lawful), and if they cannot raise any controversies that I have not covered in the letter, then the summary judgement is granted. Then all they can do is motion to reduce an excessive judgement.
Posted on: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 10:36:13 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015