I think this says everything anyone needs to know about the attitude of those who feel entitled to take what isnt theirs: If it’s inevitable that past emissions will raise sea levels four feet then there’s no point at all in limiting current emissions to prevent that four foot rise. We might as well face the floods being as rich, fat and happy as we can, without wasting resources on trying to prevent something inevitable. Doesnt it make more sense to force the rich, fat, and happy to compensate those who are losing their property and livelihood due to the actions that made them rich, fat and happy?
Posted on: Sat, 24 May 2014 20:13:17 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015