“I was born as out of wedlock. During my childhood, I had felt - TopicsExpress



          

“I was born as out of wedlock. During my childhood, I had felt uncomfortable and tightness when I was felt sympathy by people around me. 「ç§ã¯ã€å©šå¤–å­ã¨ã—ã¦ç”Ÿã¾ã‚Œã¾ã—ãŸã€‚å¹¼ã„é ƒã€å‘¨å›²ã«ã€Œã‹ã‚ã„ãã†ã€ã¨åŒæƒ…ã•ã‚Œã‚‹ãŸã³ã€ä¸è‡ªç”±ã•ã‚„窮屈ã•ã‚’æ„Ÿã˜ã¦ã„ã¾ã—ãŸã€‚(※日本語下記) Children themselves cannot choose which country to live or their parents. The inheritance provision of Civil Law seems that the law itself granted the discrimination against wedlock children.†The article of Ms. Keiko Ochiai who is a one of the writers published in Asahi newspaper dated on July 10th was interesting as there are a lot of Japanese-Filipino children who were born as out of wedlock. She said, “my mother was one who had very hard time. She had been blamed by relatives and she had felt guilty, which made her developed neurosis. The discrimination provision of inheritance of Civil Law includes the discrimination against women who gave birth out of wedlock. The out of wedlock children were written as a“child†in the space of relationship of Residence Certificate before while wedlock children were written as a “eldest son†or â€second daughterâ€. That easily makes you know that the child was born out of wedlock at that time. However now, all children are written as a “child†I stood to give my testimony as I was asked by the plaintiff in the lawsuit fighting over what were described in the Residence Certificate twenty years ago. My mother pushed me saying, “I will be content even though my private will come into the open if it can make possible to open the door resolving the discrimination in the world.†I received a lot of letters from people after my testimony at the court. I reconfirmed that a lot of people are also hiding the fact that they gave birth out of wedlock and are blaming themselves. We should not allow the law reproducing the discrimination against the specific groups. I seek from the bottom of my heart that the Supreme Court will give the decision unconstitutional to the inheritance provision.†å­ã©ã‚‚ãŒã€ã©ã®å›½ã«ç”Ÿã¾ã‚Œã€èª°ã®ã‚‚ã¨ã«ç”Ÿã¾ã‚Œã‚‹ã‹ã¯ã€è‡ªåˆ†ã§é¸ã¹ã¾ã›ã‚“。民法ã®ç›¸ç¶šè¦å®šã¯ã€å©šå¤–å­ã®å·®åˆ¥ã¯å½“然ã ã¨ã€æ³•ãŒè¨€ã£ã¦ã„るよã†ãªã‚‚ã®ã§ã™ã€‚〠婚外å­ã¨ã—ã¦ç”Ÿã¾ã‚ŒãŸJFCã®å­ã©ã‚‚ãŸã¡ã‚‚多ãã€2013å¹´7月10日付æœæ—¥æ–°èžã«æŽ²è¼‰ã•ã‚ŒãŸä½œå®¶ãƒ»è½åˆæµå­ã•ã‚“ã®è©±ã¯èˆˆå‘³æ·±ã‹ã£ãŸã§ã™ã€‚ 「ç§ã‚’産んã ã“ã¨ã§ã€æœ¬å½“ã«å¤§å¤‰ã ã£ãŸã®ã¯æ¯ã§ã—ãŸã€‚親類ã‹ã‚‰éžé›£ã•ã‚ŒãŸã‚Šã€å¾Œã‚ã‚ãŸã•ã‚’æ„Ÿã˜ãŸã‚Šã—ãŸã“ã¨ãŒå¤§ããªå¼•ã金ã®ä¸€ã¤ã¨ãªã‚Šã€ç¥žçµŒç—‡ã‚’æ‚£ã„ã¾ã—ãŸã€‚相続差別è¦å®šã¯ã€å©šå¤–å­ã‚’産んã å¥³æ€§ã«å¯¾ã™ã‚‹å·®åˆ¥ã‚‚å«ã‚“ã§ã„ã‚‹ã®ã§ã™ã€‚  以å‰ã€ä½æ°‘票ã®ç¶šã柄ã®æ¬„ã«ã¯ã€å©šå†…å­ã§ã‚ã‚Œã°ã€Œé•·ç”·ã€ã€Œæ¬¡å¥³ã€ã¨è¨˜è¼‰ã•ã‚Œã‚‹ã®ã«ã€å©šå¤–å­ã¯ã€Œå­ã€ã¨è¨˜è¼‰ã•ã‚Œã¦ã„ã¾ã—ãŸã€‚今ã¯ã€Œå­ã€ã«çµ±ä¸€ã•ã‚Œã¦ã„ã¾ã™ãŒã€å½“時ã¯å©šå¤–å­ã ã¨ã‚ã‹ã‚‹è¨˜è¼‰ã ã£ãŸã®ã§ã™ã€‚  20å¹´å‰ã€ãã®è¨˜è¼‰ã®æ˜¯éžãŒäº‰ã‚ã‚ŒãŸè£åˆ¤ã§ã€åŽŸå‘Šã‹ã‚‰ä¾é ¼ã•ã‚Œã¦è¨¼è¨€ã«ç«‹ã¡ã¾ã—ãŸã€‚æ¯ã¯ã€Œä¸–ã®ä¸­ã®å·®åˆ¥ã®è§£æ¶ˆã®æ‰‰ã‚’é–‹ãã“ã¨ãŒã§ãã‚‹ãªã‚‰ã€è‡ªåˆ†ã®ãƒ—ライベートãªã“ã¨ãŒå…¬ã«ãªã£ã¦ã‚‚構ã‚ãªã„ã€ã¨èƒŒä¸­ã‚’押ã—ã¦ãã‚Œã¾ã—ãŸã€‚  è£åˆ¤ã§è¨¼è¨€ã—ãŸã“ã¨ã§ã€å¤šãã®æ–¹ã‹ã‚‰æ‰‹ç´™ã‚’å—ã‘å–ã‚Šã¾ã—ãŸã€‚自分ãŒå©šå¤–å­ã§ã‚ã‚‹ã“ã¨ã‚„ã€å©šå¤–å­ã‚’産んã ã“ã¨ã‚’éš ã—続ã‘ã€éš ã™è‡ªåˆ†ã‚’責ã‚ã¦ã„る人ãŒå¤šã„ã¨å†ç¢ºèªã—ã¾ã—ãŸã€‚  法律ãŒã€ç‰¹å®šã®ã‚°ãƒ«ãƒ¼ãƒ—ã¸ã®å·®åˆ¥ã‚’å†ç”Ÿç”£ã™ã‚‹ã“ã¨ã¯è¨±ã•ã‚Œã¾ã›ã‚“。最高è£ãŒã€ç›¸ç¶šè¦å®šã‚’é•æ†²ã¨ã™ã‚‹ã“ã¨ã‚’心ã‹ã‚‰æ±‚ã‚ã¾ã™ã€‚〠asahi/shimen/articles/TKY201307090649.html
Posted on: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 19:17:16 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015