I was going through Daniel Bryans interview while promoting WWE 2k15. The full interview can be found here. He mentions that one man he wants to face if and when he returns is Brock Lesnar.Whether itll happen or not is anybodys guess. I was reading up some more from fans who mentioned that the match would not be believable. That got me thinking.Last year, a lot of people said how Punk vs Lesnar is not a believable match up. Eventually, they put on one of the best matches of the night and may be of the year. Now same is being said about Bryan vs Lesnar. My question is, what makes a match believable?Sure I can understand where these fans are coming from. Brock has been on amazing roll. He conquered the streak, decimated the 15 time world champion in Cena and looks an unstoppable monster at this time. However, how does that determine that a match between Bryan and Brock would be unbelievable? Over time, there have been many David vs Goliath stories where David has slayed Goliath. Plus, Bryans wrestling technical wrestling style is very different from Cenas or Takers power based wrestling style. Why would that be unbelievable? Another match up people havent really thought much about is Ambrose vs Lesnar. I can understand that Ambrose might not be ready for such a high profile match up, but why wouldnt they be able to deliver a believable high quality match up? So, here are my questions: Would a Lesnar vs Bryan match be believable? Why or why not? What makes a match believable anyway? I am looking forward to what you guys have to say.
Posted on: Sat, 30 Aug 2014 07:29:55 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015