Ibn Taymiyyah said, “It is not permissible to establish something in the religious law (sharia) based upon a weak narration which is not authentic or good, but Ahmad bin Hanbal and other scholars considered it permissible to narrate regarding virtuous deeds which are not known to be affirmed but when it is known not to be a lie. That is because when the action is known to be legislated with authentic evidence and it is known not to be a false narration, then it is possible that the reward is true, but not one of the Imams said that he considered it to be permissible to make something obligatory or recommended based upon a weak narration.” Source: Majmu Al-Fatawa 1/250 قال ابن تيمية وَلَا يَجُوزُ أَنْ يُعْتَمَدَ فِي الشَّرِيعَةِ عَلَى الْأَحَادِيثِ الضَّعِيفَةِ الَّتِي لَيْسَتْ صَحِيحَةً وَلَا حَسَنَةً لَكِنَّ أَحْمَدَ بْنَ حَنْبَلٍ وَغَيْرَهُ مِنْ الْعُلَمَاءِ جَوَّزُوا أَنْ يُرْوَى فِي فَضَائِلِ الْأَعْمَال مَا لَمْ يُعْلَمْ أَنَّهُ ثَابِتٌ إذَا لَمْ يُعْلَمْ أَنَّهُ كَذِبٌ وَذَلِكَ أَنَّ الْعَمَلَ إذَا عُلِمَ أَنَّهُ مَشْرُوعٌ بِدَلِيلِ شَرْعِيٍّ وَرُوِيَ فِي فَضْلِهِ حَدِيثٌ لَا يُعْلَمُ أَنَّهُ كَذِبٌ جَازَ أَنْ يَكُونَ الثَّوَابُ حَقًّا وَلَمْ يَقُلْ أَحَدٌ مِنْ الْأَئِمَّةِ إنَّهُ يَجُوزُ أَنْ يُجْعَلَ الشَّيْءُ وَاجِبًا أَوْ مُسْتَحَبًّا بِحَدِيثِ ضَعِيفٍ 1/250 مجموع فتاوى ابن تيمية العقيدة كتاب توحيد الألوهية »رسالة في التوسل والوسيلة
Posted on: Sun, 21 Jul 2013 10:16:41 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015