If paidmedia favours a pseudo-anti-corruption hero, then the pro-corruption leaders can loose even though former is just a pseudo !! Thats why, paidmedia can make ArKe win. Solution? We tell voters the FACT that more the votes NOTA gets better will be FUTURE politics. . NOTA is indeed a short term loss. But when ALL candidates are corrupt or pseudo, then NoTA enables voters to communicate to activists that they do want change , and this will energize activists to work for change. A resounding victory or any of the three corrupt or psuedo options will only give WRONG message to activists. . Just as India has more pseudo-secular than seculars, India has far far more pseudo-anti-corruption that anti-corruption activists. And as always, pseudo will look like real till one asks for DRAFTS and read the draft. And as long as drafts are avoided, pseudo and real will look alike, . And psuedo will get exposed. But if paidmedia protects pseudo , and activists never ask him questions in public, then pseudo will always look like real , till he rules for 5 -10 years. And that would be 5 - 10 years wasted. . Solution is that activists should put question before ALL three leaders -- MaKeBe = Maken , ArKe , KeBi . And as leaders refuse to give answers, or give gol gol answers, the voters will be convinced that leaders are either pro-corruption like Maken or pseudo-anti-corruption like KiBe / ArKe . In fact, now KiBe can be rightly called as pro-corruption leader, because she joined BJP with condition that she would be made CM. . HOW NOTA WILL HELP =================== . If say 5% or more voters vote for NoTA , then it will convince activists that voters do know that all three are fake , and that voters want new options and so activists will work for more options. . And if only 1% or less vote for NoTA, then activists will believe that voters are fool, and so they will think of working with less bad options. .
Posted on: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 12:01:53 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015