If you REALLY want to see a good debate, and what a debate is supposed to look like, watch the PBS documentary titled Judgment Day: Intelligent Design on Trial (creationism vs. evolution). There is much that is applicable to the Hebrew vs. Kemet debate. Here I equate the debating Hebrew camps to the Creationists in this documentary. I set the timer on this video to start at 5:08 because the professor (Kevin Padian) in this segment states, in essence, what I stated regarding the Hebrew Israelite camps. His words are as follows: Intelligent design is not . . . anywhere a scientific concept. Its not a field of science. Its not being actively researched . . . by anyone. This is the current state of Hebrew Israelites coming out of these camps. You have a gang of people who read and argue the Bible, but none of them are scholars in the text (philology) and none of them are experts in any other field of inquiry with research that verify the claims in the text (e.g., anthropology, genetics, archaeology, linguistics, mathematics, engineering, astronomy, paleontology, geology, etc.). The Black Hebrew 12 Tribes Chart, for example, is not a scientific field of study. There are no Black Hebrew Isrealite geologists who have done the research and established Noahs flood. There are no geneticists who have established, among Black Hebrew Israelites, that humanity derives from Noah, his three sons, and their wives. And that a Black nation and a White nation are the result of the birth of Jacob and Esau. There is no active Black Hebrew Israelite excavation team unearthing artifacts in Egypt or Arabia or the Levant for an exodus of millions of Israelites out of Egypt. There is no scholarship coming out of these camps; only Youtube videos and FB debates. That is not scholarship. Watch the entire PBS special and see the quality of the nature of the creationism vs. evolution debate, and what we have seen recently with the rap-battle-style debates on Youtube. At least the European attempts to be scientific with his Creationism. Notice I said attempts. In order for something to be scientific, it must be falsifiable. Still waiting on the information about that large fish in the Mediterranean sea that gobbles humans. Even more, that it is scientifically possible to stay alive in the belly of the fish for three days and not be affected by the enzymes that would normally decompose a body. But I guess that just falls on faith now doesnt it, which then would make it, as expected, unscientific.
Posted on: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 12:50:47 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015