Im beginning to wonder why these events have an obvious lie attached to them. Why would you tell someone a lie and then, at the same time, show them that you are lying to them? The obvious actors at Boston - guy pushed down the street with his shin bone sticking out and both legs blown away - survives and throws a pitch at a Red Sox game a few weeks later, the county assessors entries of -0- balances on Christmas Day at Sandy Hook, the collapse of WTC7 at 5:20 when they could have waited til dark to push the button, the obvious fake of Ottawa and the Google virtual tour photos of the bullet holes a year before the Queens Guard shooting of the new convert to Islam, the faked execution of the policeman on a Paris sidewalk. And, I could sight a dozen more examples. Why would you tell your wife you were not screwing somebody else and then show her a motel receipt? I think its meant to demean the person, to show absolute control, to enslave. To, not only own the person but to call them n-------- and screw their daughters at the same time - these are the behavior of the ugliest people this planet has produced - Nazi and brutal slave owners - demeaning the subjugated person demonstrates complete control. I think Hitlers propagandist, Goebel wrote about this. Somethings happening here and you dont know what it is, do you? Mr. Jones.
Posted on: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 18:44:03 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015