In Light Of Federal Court Ruling, OC Police Officers ‘Have To - TopicsExpress



          

In Light Of Federal Court Ruling, OC Police Officers ‘Have To Tread Lightly’ With Boardwalk Street Performers This Summer Shawn J. Soper, News Editor OCEAN CITY -- Keeping the peace and finding a balance on the Boardwalk street performer issue are the challenges facing the Ocean City Police Department (OCPD) on the eve of another summer season in the resort. After two successful challenges in federal court to the resort’s ordinance regarding street performers, the latest of which came down last fall, some of the teeth have been removed from the town’s somewhat stringent laws regarding the omnipresent street performers and buskers on the Boardwalk. However, on the eve of another Memorial Day weekend, the OCPD is intent on acknowledging the First Amendment rights of the buskers while looking out for the interests of the public and the Boardwalk merchants. Last November, a federal judge ruled against the town of Ocean City in a civil suit that challenged the 30-foot noise ordinance for street performers on the Boardwalk. That ruling came on the heels of a 2011 federal court ruling that the town’s ordinance in part violated a spray paint artist’s First Amendment protections for freedom of speech and expression. As a result, the federal court ruling allowed street performers and artists to sell or collect money for certain expressive materials. In the ruling, U.S. District Court Judge Ellen Hollander issued an opinion granting a permanent injunction essentially prohibiting the town from enforcing the 30-foot noise ordinance for street performers on the Boardwalk. The offseason ruling came at a time when Boardwalk busker issues were obviously not front and center, but with the dawn of a new season, the ruling and the previous ruling on spray paint artist Mark Chase’s similar suit are back in the forefront. OCPD Lieutenant Mark Pacini, Watch Commander on the Southern District Evening Shift, said this week the latest court ruling is creating challenges heading into the summer season. “The court decided the 30-foot rule was not reasonable,” he said. “Now, we did our own tests with sound experts and found he was clearly in violation of the 50-foot rule, but the court saw it differently and that’s what we have to abide with.” Emboldened by the various court rulings, some buskers will likely push the limits of the town’s watered down ordinance this summer and complaints from Boardwalk merchants, who often decry the fact the buskers are allowed to set up shop just a few feet away from where they have taxpaying businesses with expensive leases, will likely continue. “The bottom line is, we’re trying to strike a balance up there and make sure the ordinance is enforced and the Boardwalk merchants concerns are addressed,” he said. “We have a nice working relationship with the buskers for the most part and we want everybody to peacefully coexist up there without infringing on the rights of the performers while at the same time looking out for the interests of the city, the merchants and, of course, the visitors.” Pacini said the noise aspect of the ordinance was challenging for a lot of reasons, no matter if the rule is 30 feet, 50 feet or even 10 feet. “The noise angle is tricky on the Boardwalk,” he said. “It’s tough up there because of all of the ambient sound. You have the rides and amusements, the sounds coming from the stores and the crowds.” While the federal judge ruled in favor of the noise suit brought by violinist William Hassay, Jr., perhaps the biggest challenge for the OCPD was the earlier ruling on Chase’s case about what constituted expressive material and art in terms of the First Amendment. “Mr. Hassay challenged the noise aspect of the ordinance, but Chase is the guy who really changed how we enforce things up on the Boardwalk,” said Pacini. “He challenged his First Amendment rights to free expression and that opened another can of worms. There are things that are protected under free speech and free expression and the list is long and rather murky. That’s our challenge.” The list of acceptable freedom of expression items and art is long and somewhat vague. Pacini said the challenge is determining what is protected. More: see below
Posted on: Thu, 22 May 2014 16:49:32 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015