In many respects the destruction of marriage is more about male liberation than feminism. Traditional marriage was too one sided a deal. Economic security for women, wageslavery for men. Relationship security for women, endless demands for men. Never enough time away from the small world of wife and children, time to think. Time to let go of the emotional firestorm, provoked by petite needs. The man seen as provider for the woman, whereas in a natural economy a man should do what he was called to do, instead of earning an income at the cost of his mission. If hes lucky, he can support a family with that, but it is not the main goal of his work. The other day I was watching Out of Africa and the game of the man being ensnared by the lure of the woman and his resentment against it were all too palpable. Throughout history married men have been dominated by their women, while maintaining the facade of the head of the household. Disenfranchized by dominant mothers in the relationship with their children. D. H. Lawrences Sons and Lovers is an excellent example of how this went even back then. Raised by women to be mentally weak and physically strong, while their mothers were raising their sisters to be the opposite is one of the ways matriarchy has always fitted hand in glove with worldly power. Dominance of purely matriarchical values over male ones. Security vs. Improvement. Income Security vs. doing something worth while. Conformism vs. Creativity. Looking good vs. Honesty. Comfort vs. Honor. Yes, Babylon could not have ruled without its longstanding alliance with Matriarchy. Its hardly surprising its main stooges, elite Jews, are known to be the most pussy whipped of them all. But as always, when one force reaches its climax, within its center its opposite emerges and that is what we are witnessing today.
Posted on: Sat, 24 May 2014 16:09:05 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015