In this article: LegalPronews runs my article on Eric Holder trying the break the knee caps of Standard and Poor, which in 2012 downgraded the US rating. Do S&P attorneys know that according to CA antiSLAPP statute they can have the case dismissed immediately and get their attorneys fees from the feds? Posted on | August 19, 2013 | 7 Comments Do you remember mob movies where Guido and Bruno are threatening to break the knee caps of a shop keeper unless he pays of the mob? For years all of the rating agencies gave high ratings to companies and financial institutions which where questionable. If the feds were to bring legal actions against all of the rating companies, such actions would have been consistent. However, the feds brought a legal action only against one company, Standard and Poor, the only rating company which in 2012 reduced the triple A rating of the U.S sovereign debt. Similarly the feds went after the polling companies, like Gallops, which polled Obama lower then others did. Eric Holder chose to bring his legal challenge against the Standard and Poor in the Central District of CA, in Santa Ana division. What works for S&P is a CA AntiSLAPP statute. It allows defendants to bring an AntiSLAPP motion, dismiss the whole case early on and get their attorneys fees from the plaintiffs, in this case from the federal government. Since the feds chose to bring the case in CA, they used a double aged sward that S&P can use against them. Anti SLAPP or CA statute 425.16 is envisioned by the CA legislature as a legal remedy to fight bogus law suits brought solely to harass the defendants and to silence them, to limit public participation. The case is being heard by the same judge, David O Carter, who presided over my challenges against Obama. One of such challenges brought on behalf of Ambassador AlanKeyes is the best known. In that case Judge Carter pressured me to re-serve Obama yet again for the fourth time, through the U.S. attorney, he promised the case will not be dismissed on technicality, such as lack of standing and jurisdiction, however after I served Obama yet again through the U.S. attorney, Judge Carter did exactly what he promised not to do, he dismissed the case claiming lack of jurisdiction and standing. His law clerk in the case was one Siddharth Velamoor, who during the clerkship was still employed by Perkins Coie, a law firm, which represented Obama in eligibility legal actions. When I brought a motion for reconsideration and pointed conflict of interest, Judge Carter simply ignored it. He also inserted in his final ruling and memorandum references to some letters that he received in his chambers, that were not a part of the case, not a part of the docket, which were highly defamatory against me as an attorney for the defendants. When I protested and demanded to remove those from the opinion, or hold a hearing so I can prove that it is a defamation of my character, Judge Carter ignored it yet again. So, if you believe you can get justice and unbiased and impartial opinion in Judge Carter’s court room, think again. Carter is a Clinton appointee, worked for JAG in the military, known as a judge who traveled to the Eastern Europe in the wake of the fall of the iron curtain. I do not believe Carter would grant antiSLAPP,(anti Strategic Law Suit Against Public Participation) however his decision would give the defense a glimpse on where he stands and they can go with their appeal to the 9th Circuit. That’s what I did in a similar situation and I am waiting to see what the 9th circuit will do. I believe that antiSLAPP is a great option for any defendant who was slapped with a bogus law suit filed just to silence the defendants. I believe this should be used in every cases of knee cap breaking by Eric Holder. what a coincidence. The same judge, David O’Carter, who presided … legalpronews.findlaw/article/0gd0c84dxI4Gf 9 hours ago - The articles posted represent only the opinion of the writers and do not necessarily… Full Article at Dr. Orly Taitz, Esquire. San Diego Union-Tribune logo …
Posted on: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 00:48:26 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015