India must be protected and kept as the homeland and center of the Vedic heritage, Sanatana-dharma, Hinduism. Without it, what is its value, in spite of whatever else it accomplishes? The value of Hinduism and India are clearly expressed in the words of the famous English theosophist Dr. Annie Besant. She put great emphasis on the value of India, its history, the Vedic culture, and its importance to the world. As written in the cover notes from the book, Hindus, Life-Line of India, by G. M. Jagtiani, she says: “After a study of some forty years and more of the great religions of the world, I find none so perfect, none so scientific, none so philosophic, and none so spiritual as the great religion known by the name of Hinduism. The more you know it, the more you will love it; the more you try to understand it, the more deeply you will value it. Make no mistake; without Hinduism, India has no future. Hinduism is the soil into which India’s roots are struck, and torn of that she will inevitably wither, as a tree torn out from its place. Many are the religions and many are the races flourishing in India, but none of them stretches back into the far dawn of her past, nor are they necessary for her endurance as a nation. Everyone might pass away as they came and India would still remain. But let Hinduism vanish and what is she? A geographical expression of the past, a dim memory of a perished glory, her literature, her art, her monuments, all have Hindudom written across them. And if Hindus do not maintain Hinduism, who shall save it? If India’s own children do not cling to her faith, who shall guard it? India alone can save India, and India and Hinduism are one.” In this light, it is absolutely necessary that as followers of Sanatana-dharma, Vedic culture, we realize that we need to repair whatever differences we have between us regarding whatever issues there may be. This is necessary in order to work with some cooperation with whomever we can if we expect to be a substantial force in defending the Vedic cause. Otherwise, all the issues that invariably come up, although these should not be ignored, should not take so much of our attention that our preaching or sharing or promoting of our culture stops. Otherwise, we will only serve as contributors to the continuing deterioration of all spiritual standards as the age of Kali-yuga progresses. This preaching, of course, means that we must all stay in touch with and practice the Vedic standards, and be ready to let others know of its advantages, and to defend it from those who wish to see its demise. We cannot allow ourselves to be led into the danger of endless debate that leads to inaction. We all must be pro-active in some way to help defend and spread Vedic culture. Then we can work together to keep the freedom we presently have to practice the Vedic traditions and keep India as the homeland of a thriving, dynamic, and still living tradition. Such freedom does not come without its challenges, and we must be prepared as a society to meet those challenges. To take such freedoms for granted means that it’s only a matter of time before they are lost. And that is exactly what some people want to happen. So we must be willing to work all the harder to prevent such a decline of our Vedic heritage.Any act is forbidden by law is an offence ,it is an unlawful act , a breach of law ,the classification has further laid down the responsibility of such wrong doer as a criminal offence ,civil administrative financial and other economical offence. In assessment of its ingredients with infringement ,the form of anti social behaviour in accordance with its degree of guilt has to be taken into consideration as affecting to the socio-economic and legal concept for the various social aspects can a criminal having anti social behaviour with the emergence of individual negative qualities having no responsibility and control over anti social phenomenon presupposes an appropriate judicial qualification for the enforcement of his fundamental right. This will distort the picture for prevention of the crime became it affects human destiny and provide an attack over moral fabric of the society. A socially dangerous act is more dangerous than an individual act towards the objective aspect to concrete omission which constitutes the corpus deliecti to regulate human behaviour. Thus the fundamental rights which are considered to be invalidated for implementing the directive principles of the state policy by introduction of Article 31-a,31-b and 31-c removing to some extent the veto of Article 13 as being upheld in Keshvanand Bharti case should necessarily be restricted in respect of its enforceability in favour of anti social criminals protection as a part enforceable fundamental duties of others.
Posted on: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 04:27:13 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015