Interesting question…I put it in this way: Where in our galaxy can expect scientifically intelligence life without any fantastic imagination, only scientifically? The short answer is in around the radius-orbit of our Sun in the galaxy and bigger one and into star system where the star is similar to the Sun like age and size. That guaranty that this star has similar to our solar system planets, but like own belts of centripetal accelerations, not compulsory exactly the same sizes planets like ours. And one more important condition: this star to possess similar angular velocity of revolving to our sun. That is important because this velocity actually is the velocity of birth about each orbiting around the star planet. Proofs: Let begin with this: Mercury as well the other planets in the solar system was born from the Sun because all planets centripetal acceleration fulfills the rule: g=(V.C)/R ln(1+V/C) where R – is the distance between the planet and the Sun, V=w.R where w – is the angular velocity of the equatorial area of the Sun. See USM part I kanevuniverse Obtained result coincides with the same acceleration estimated by the law: g=G.M/r^2 Second important suggestion is that the Sun in fact synthesis all nature element until uranium, but not only iron how was estimated so far. It is so because of the essence of the field, see again Part I USM. So the core of the Sun is contains from super dense and therefore with huge gravitational attraction material - nuclear chain, most probably from uranium nuclei, see joromachine kanevuniverse and with super strong common magnetic moment. That is why the Sun changes its magnetic poles for about 11 years or so – because of the interaction between this core and the plasma surrounding it. How it is seen this core reminds the so called “neutron star”, which of course hasn’t any physical means because such creation is impossible, as well this is in force about the so called “black hole”. Such core possesses any star, even any planet but the difference is only in the size of the core – in smallest objects this core can be only centimeter’s radius (see again USM and essence of the field). The size of the core of our Sun is around 70 km in radius (see USM). For example proof about this assertion we can find out in rings and moons of Saturn, in their different direction of revolving (some of them), which shows that the core of Saturn also changes its polarization, similarly to the Sun, but very slowly, because the Saturn is far smaller and far cooler than the Sun. Now we can suppose that Mercury (because it was born from the Sun last in line) has most large quantity of heaviest elements in comparison with the rest of the planets and that is why Mercury is most dense object in the solar system. Maybe the core of Mercury is responsible for volcanic activity there and maybe it is in force about all planets?! And this: Nice issue, but with some objections: First of all, why you don’t consider the following phenomenon when review the live evolution on the Earth, namely the increasing of the mass of proton and in slightly less extension of electron from the birth place of the Sun in the center of our galaxy (where these particles was only one sort – proto particles) during of its movement towards the periphery of the galaxy and how the changing of the features of such atoms like a building bloc of proteins, changes the features of the live molecules themselves? But first let see the next: So as I said the beginning particle in the center of our galaxy – proto particle it is a very young galaxy from the subspace, which because of the thickening of the micro cosmos and expansion of the macro cosmos of our space where is situated our galaxy, gradually form the three stable particles in our space: proton, electron and neutrino. During the movement of the Sun towards the periphery of our galaxy the proton and electron become heavier and the neutrino becomes lighter. If we sink in the space of this proto particle and become part of it we can see galaxy with very many stars from the subspace, similar to ours, so the temperature there will be significant, but because in the very beginning of this proto particle appearance in our space, when this particle haven’t yet orbital system, for us the energy don’t exist. When on the center of our galaxy there is created, because of the gravitational field of our galaxy, enough quantity of these proto particles again thanks to the same field there begin to form the stars, which creates exactly copy of our galaxy but with very young matter-all this in our space. The light ray radiated from these substars becomes older together with the movement of the Sun towards the periphery of our galaxy (i.e. together with the aging of the Sun), so the age of the relic radiation is roughly 13 bln years. That has nothing to do with the high energy particles, which can to exist in our galaxy and on the between galaxy space, because of the many reasons. The gravitation field and inertial matter balance, about our galaxy indeed leads to necessity of existence of same matter so called dark matter, but there isn’t take into account the way of forming of the gravitation field according to USM kanevuniverse….and many more! So let continue from here: As I said in the part I on the theory USM kanevuniverse when the Sun passes through the galaxy belts of centripetal accelerations, then were borne the three groups of planets on the solar system due the disturbance of these belts field over the Sun own centripetal acceleration – inertial balance and the planets at these moments are around 4-5 billion years so far (the comets, asteroids and cosmic gas have nothing to do with the planets formation, on contrary these objects were borne together with the planets and therefore with the same age) At this moment of planets birth the Sun already contains atoms from protons and electrons but a lot lighter than their present masses and continuously become heavier. So obviously quantum stimulation of such atoms will produce light-“lighter” which is different from this one which we observe here on the present position of the Sun, but when this light passes through the centripetal accelerations belts towards galaxy radius increasing, then this light gradually becomes” heavier” until reaching known here frequencies. So that is why we don’t observe the center of the any galaxy because there the “hydrogen-atoms” for example are contain from two proto particles with almost indistinguishable masses between the “electron” and “proton” see superconductivity USM kanevuniverse So the Earth atmosphere comes to existence in present atom’s form much latter than Brian’s assertion. More interestingly from here follows that the organisms cannot exist if we begin to move by some device towards the center of our galaxy ( how I said in the page 2 of the theory) firstly will appears some vital illnesses and if we continue, then these organisms simply will disintegrated themselves. So to survive we must to chose stars with a little smaller orbital radius than the Sun one, which is means more younger, so there to live some millions of years to hand over our genetic code to the present atoms there, i.e. until our atom’s from at now Sun radius-position exchange with these ones on the new younger sun….in this way continuously (step by step) we can ignore the expansion of the surrounding space and radial shifting of our Sun towards the periphery of our galaxy where wait for us the aging and death together with our Sun. How much remains I don’t know but may be one or maximum two revolving of our galaxy which is around 400-500 millions of years only! So we must to hurry, to build the machine-joromachine kanevuniverse to have a new supmaterial which permit us to build the rocket chamber where we can direct to ignite the thermonuclear synthesis and by this way to build the space ship which can travel with the speed close to the speed of light, so the traveling to the next stars to becomes reality. That is very nice fairy-tales in unison with the Brian’s fairy-tales…..Good night! Now I can suggest the following idea: What about the reason for dinosaur’s extinction it isn’t meteorite colliding but changing of atom’s features because of the above changing of the mass of electrons and protons? For example when these masses are lighter then the features of the live molecules are less contrasting and for the organism building are necessary large number atoms (which means big animals like dinosaurs) than if these masses are heavier which require smaller animals? G.Kanev
Posted on: Fri, 02 Jan 2015 23:46:59 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015