Interestingly, I noticed that in the role reversals, women were less aggressive--even while acting--and more timid than the men. This indicates a few things. (About sociological allowances for men and women, and the empathy factor that women seem to have--not all, but some.) This is why feminists exist. Some feminists are angry. Others arent. But the men in these ads appeared to be perfectly comfortable in their aggression, and the camera was just as friendly. So, men can be aggressive and angry... but angry women are feminazis. On the other end of the spectrum were... too sensitive? OR we dislike the notion of being mistreated (or--empathy again--watching other women be ALLOWED TO BE mistreated.) I have no vendetta against men. I have, in fact, stood up against abusive women because its the same problem: one person is allowed to hurt another (particularly for their own pleasure or amusement). This is not ok. It is not ok when women do it, not ok when men do it, and when animals do this, we shoot them. Its easy not to see something you aint looking for. This might not be your cup o tea (haha still shot reference) but it is worth looking at in its entirety.
Posted on: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 16:23:26 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015