Is it just me or has anyone else realized how biased this whole BCS thing is.... Example #1, the best team Alabama has played so far this year is Virginia Tech, the same Virginia Tech who lost to Duke. You didnt misread that, I did in fact say Duke. But they are number 1 because of the BCS title they won last year. The same BCS game they wouldnt have even competed in if not for an ineligible Ohio state team for trading items that they received, their personal property, for tattoos. But Alabama players are apparently allowed to accept loans from coaches now a days or sign their autographs for cash. But thats off subject. My point is alabamas schedule is shit but they remain number one based on last years accomplishments, yet Ohio State is #3 and cant climb any higher because of strength of schedule, but the fact that they havent lost in 21 games is ignored because you cant rank teams this year off of last years accomplishments. Whatever works out the best for the sec I suppose... I thoroughly believe that LSU and A&M are ranked so high because it benefits Alabama. A three loss team should not be ranked at this point in the year. And there is no way a 2 loss team who hasnt beaten a single ranked team should be in the top ten.
Posted on: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 15:45:04 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015