Is the Holy Trinity a flawed man-made theory or is it sound doctrine? The Apostle Paul admonished young Timothy, Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils; (1 Timothy 4:1) The Greek word that was translated into English as depart from is aphistemi (Strongs G868) pronounced ä-fe-sta-me meaning ... 1) to make stand off, cause to withdraw, to remove a) to excite to revolt 2) to stand off, to stand aloof a) to go away, to depart from anyone b) to desert, withdraw from one c) to fall away, become faithless d) to shun, flee from e) to cease to vex one f) to withdraw ones self from, to fall away g) to keep ones self from, absent ones self from Some use this portion of Scripture to accuse those of us who embrace the Apostles One God Monotheistic Doctrine, as opposed to the Holy Trinity, as being the ones who are being described above. However, what should be determined is who said and did what ... and when did they say and do it. First off, we know the foot print followers of our Lord Jesus Christ had it right! If anybody has ever had it right, they had it right. And, no where do we find where they were authorized to come up with anything other than what Jesus gave them. By the way, Jesus did NOT leave them with a bunch of pages with a lot of blanks on them, which would have to be filled out a couple centuries later, either. Therefore, what they embraced and taught was first. Any thing other than that came along later, period! Paul being as bold and blunt as he was, put it this way ... But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed. (Galatians 1:8-9) Again, the Apostle Paul admonished Timothy, Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all longsuffering and doctrine. For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables. (2 Timothy 4:2-4) The Greek word that was translated into English as endure is anecho (Strongs G430) pronounced ä-ne-kho meaning ... 1) to hold up 2) to hold ones self erect and firm 3) to sustain, to bear, to endure Many are taught, firmly believe and will adamantly defend a position, that the doctrine of the Holy Trinity comes straight from the pages of the Bible, itself. When, in fact, the word Holy is the only part that can be found in the Bible. The word Trinity cant be found in a single solitary Scripture in the entire King James Version of the Holy Bible. Neither did anyone in the entire King James Version of the Holy Bible ever refer to God or the Godhead with these words, One God in three persons, as multitudes do today. With such a widely accepted belief, and millions just going with the flow, the crowd has to be right, right? Well, lets see what Jesus had to say in Matthew 7:13-14 ... Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat: Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it. Folks, its time for a gut level reality check. According to the greatest Teacher ever to walk upon Planet Earth, when it comes to spiritual matters ... THE CROWD IS WRONG! Not one single solitary person in the entire Bible ever used the following terms ... New Testament. New Catholic Encyclopedia, 1967 Edition, Vol.13, p.1021 - The first use of the Latin word trinitas (trinity) with reference to God, is found in Tertullians writings (about 213 A.D.) He was the first to use the term persons (plural) in a Trinitarian context. Encyclopedia Americana, 1957 Edition, Vol.27, p.69 - The word Trinity is not in Scripture. The term persons (plural) is not applied in Scripture to the Trinity. World Book Encyclopedia, 1975 Edition, Vol. T, p.363 - Belief in Father, Son and Holy Ghost was first defined by the earliest general council of churches. This was the First Council of Nicaea in 325 A.D. New International Encyclopedia, Vol.22, p.476 - The Catholic faith is this: We worship one God in Trinity, but there is one Person of the Father, another of the Son and another of the Holy Ghost. The Glory equal - the Majesty co-eternal. The doctrine is not found in its fully developed form in the Scriptures. Modern theology does not seek to find it in the Old Testament. At the time of the Reformation the Protestant Church took aver the doctrine of the Trinity without serious examination. Life Magazine, October 30, 1950, Vol.29, No.18, p.51 - The Catholics made this statement concerning their doctrine of the Trinity, to defend the dogma of the assumption of Mary, in an article written by Graham Greene: Our opponents sometimes claim that no belief should be held dogmatically which is not explicitly stated in Scripture... But the PROTESTANT CHURCHES have themselves accepted such dogmas as THE TRINITY, for which there is NO SUCH PRECISE AUTHORITY in the Gospels Many use the human reasoning and logic that the non-Biblical words trinity, triune or persons (pertaining to God and/or the Godhead) should be accepted just as the words rapture and Bible are .... or even the word sandwich (for that matter). And, even though sandwich is not a Biblical word, I know theyre real cause I ate one yesterday. So, my point ... or my question ... is, what Biblical words could be used in the place of the words trinity, triune OR persons pertaining to God and/or the Godhead? I wouldnt have any trouble at all finding Biblical words to use in the place of sandwich, rapture and Bible. They are: bread and meat, caught up Word of God and book. Now, if those who embrace the man-made theory of the Trinity can find any words that will do for truine, persons or trinity what the words bread and meat, caught up Word of God and book will do for sandwich, rapture and Bible, I would love to see them. Unless or until they can, I suggest that they stop adding to or taking from (depending on how you look at it) the Word of God by embracing, as dogmatically held doctrine, a theory which is NOT specifically mentioned in the Bible ... and without any Biblical words which could serve as a substitute to describe a tag-team of wrestlers. And, while the Bible does NOT authorize a belief in three persons who jointly form One God, it does accurately describe God as the Father in Creation, the Son in Redemption and the Holy Spirit living in the hearts of believers throughout the New Testament Church Age. There is more Scriptural to support three forms of God ... three manifestations of God ... three titles of God ... three offices/positions which God holds or ... three roles in which God functions ... than there is THREE PERSONS of God. That is strictly a flawed theory! If it’s a matter of semantics, one God in three persons is an add on that people would be wise to just leave off. I can very accurately be described as a father, son and husband ... or a teacher, student and administrator. While I function in more than one capacity and occupy more than one office, and wear a number of different hats, I am still just ONE person. As a matter of fact, I can be in the same room with, and in the presence of, my mother, my wife and my daughters, and I can speak, act and function as a father, son and husband without anybody getting confused as to how many persons I am or who is talking. English was my worst subject in school, but I do remember a few things. For illustration purposes only, it is not proper to link the singular pronoun He, which refers to one person, to verbs like: see, hear and warn ... which would look like this ... He see, He hear and He warn. When using the singular pronoun He, it is necessary to use the verbs sees, hears and warns ... He SEES, He HEARS and He WARNS. In order to use the verbs see, hear and warn, you must use a noun or pronoun which is plural and identifies more than one person like, People ... People see, People hear and People warn. Yet, intelligent people who know this rule, but who have been indoctrinated to believe that there are three persons of God, ignore this rule when it comes to the word GOD (the Hebrew word Elohim). **IF** the word GOD (Elohim) identifies more than one person, as the trinitarians insist, the Bible should read like this, God SEE, God HEAR and God WARN ... AND IT DOESNT! The word GOD is never linked to a verb like that. Instead, the word GOD is ALWAYS linked to verbs just as the word He (a singular person) is ... like this, God SEES, God HEARS and God WARNS. Again, I use these particular words for illustration purposes only, but I hope I have made my point ... and that its CLEAR. Men started reading things into the Scriptures a couple centuries or so AFTER One God in three persons, God the Son, God the Holy Ghost (or Holy Spirit), The Holy Trinity So, how and when did the doctrine of the Holy Trinity come into existence? And, why is it so widely accepted, today? Those two questions are certainly valid ones, and deserve serious examination and consideration. Encyclopedia International, 1975 Edition, Vol.18, p.226 - The doctrine of the Trinity did not form part of the apostles preaching, as this is reported in the Jesus ascended back up into Heaven, and after the foot print followers of our Lord had passed on. As a result, there has evolved all sorts of religious beliefs and denominations. However, in order to get people to stop and think about a few things, I use the Clark Kent/Superman analogy quite a bit. Jesus said and did some of the things He said and did to set an example for those who witnessed it to follow, as well as for those of us who would read about it 2,000 years later. At any rate, the reason I use Clark Kent/Superman is because people are familiar with the scenario. And, although Clark Kent/Superman is a fictitious character, I contend that the Incarnate Christ was, indeed, the REAL Superman. And, as a result, Jesus often spoke of the Father as if the Father where someone other than Himself who was way off in another galaxy or solar system. As a former trinitarian, myself, I understand why those who have been indoctrinated to believe theres two or three of em up there believe such, as well as those who interpret ... and try to understand ... the Bible literally. However, spiritual things are NOT understood with human reasoning and logic. And, Jesus was unlike any one else who has ever walked upon planet Earth. While He possessed the Glory and Power of Deity, He went about as a lowly servant. He had a human nature as a result of actually being born of a woman. And, He had a Divine nature as a result of Him being God manifested in the flesh. Also, Jesus served as the example ... or the template (so to speak) ... for all Christians to pattern themselves after. And, as a result, He said and did many things for our benefit ... AND to set an example for us to follow. By the way, I am NOT saying Jesus was deceitful, nor that He lied ... far from it. Its just that He could (and did) speak, act and function as any ordinary man, at times. And, He also could (and did) speak, act and function as Almighty God, at other times, while here on Earth. Those who have ears to hear, hears what the Spirit saith, and arent trying to fuel a flawed, man-made, pre-conceived and indoctrinated agenda, will, I believe, come to the understanding as to who Jesus really is **IF** they truly hunger and thirst for righteousness. Then, it will be up to them what they do from that point. They can continue on in their traditions and doctrines of men OR they can come out from among them and be ye separate. Since Isaiah was a MAJOR Messianic Prophet in the Old Testament, my challenge for every natural Jew and every professing Christian who believes the man-made theory of the Holy Trinity OR those who believe Jesus was Michael the Archangel or some other inferior subordinate is very simple. I challenge all natural Jews, all professing Christians who believes the man-made theory of the Holy Trinity, the entire Watchtower Society constituency, the Vatican, and the entire Roman Catholic Church constituency, as well as any and all members and/or associates, past and present, of the various and sundry Protestant denominations, any and all independent Bible students and scholars including the entire constituency of the anything connected to or remotely resembling the Mormon Church ... or anyone else (**IF** I missed anybody) ... to read 11 Chapters in the Book of Isaiah (Chapters 41, 43, 44, 47, 48, 49, 53, 54, 59, 60, and 63) and then provide me with the Scripture(s) they believe supports the belief that the coming (prophesied and promised) MESSIAH would be someone BESIDES Jehovah/God, Himself. Those of us who embrace the Apostles One God Monotheistic Doctrine understand something very important: The Incarnate Christ was the Alpha and the Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last ... God manifest in the flesh. And, these are just a few of the documenting Scriptures I use ... Isaiah 9:6, Isaiah 44:6; Isaiah 48:12; Micah 1:2-3; John 1:1-14; John 10:30-33; John 14:6-11; Colossians 2:8-10; 1 Timothy 3:16; Rev. 2:8; Rev. 21:6; and Rev. 22:13. Yes, the Doctrine of the Holy Trinity is a flawed man-made theory, and is NOT sound doctrine at all. Therefore, upon learning this, a person should ask themselves this question, Do I want Truth in its entirety, or do I want mans flawed theories and traditions? Whatever you decide, it is entirely up to you. In the final analysis of things, you and I will be justified or condemned not by just our faith and beliefs alone, but also by the words we speak AND our deeds. Silence can be interpreted as consent. There are sins of omissions and sins of commission. And, there will be lots of good people in hell. Being good is NOT good enough. If you doubt or dispute that, read Acts Chapter 10. A very closely related subject to this is the words that are invoked at baptismal services. The name that was alluded to in Matthew 28:19 is the precious name of JESUS. Quoting Matthew 28:19 does NOT fulfill the Great Commission. Those who knew how it was to be done, invoked the precious name of Jesus in Acts 2:37-41; Acts 8:14-17; Acts 10:44-48; and Acts 19:1-6. Jesus was NOT telling His disciples what to say in Matthew 28:19, He was telling them what to do. Besides, nobody was baptized in Matthew 28:19. And, nobody in the entire Bible was baptized in the titles of Father, Son and Holy Ghost. We are admonished in Colossians 3:17 to do whatever we do in word AND deed, to do it all of it in the NAME of Jesus. And, besides the baptism examples, here are a couple other places (direct quotes) where the name of Jesus was invoked in word and deed instead of the titles of Father, Son and Holy Ghost .... Acts 3:6 Then Peter said, Silver and gold have I none; but such as I have give I thee: In the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth rise up and walk. Acts 16:18 And this did she many days. But Paul, being grieved, turned and said to the spirit, I command thee in the name of Jesus Christ to come out of her. And he came out the same hour. History also documents baptism in the name of Jesus ... Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics (1951). II, 384, 389: The formula used was in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ or some synonymous phrase; there is no evidence for the use of the trine name… The earliest form, represented in the Acts, was simple immersion… in water, the use of the name of the Lord, and the laying on of hands. To these were added, at various times and places which cannot be safely identified, (a) the trine name (Justin)… Interpreters Dictionary of the Bible (1962), I 351: evidence .. suggests that baptism in early Christianity was administered, not in the threefold name, but in the name of Jesus Christ or in the name of the Lord Jesus. Otto Heick, A History of Christian Thought (1965), I, 53: At first baptism was administered in the name of Jesus, but gradually in the name of the Triune God: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Hastings Dictionary of the Bible (1898). I, 241: [One explanation is that] the original form of words was into the name of Jesus Christ or the Lord Jesus, Baptism into the name of the Trinity was a later development. Williston Walker, A History of the Christian Church (1947), page 58: The trinitarian baptismal formula,,, was displacing the older baptism in the name of Christ. The New Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge (1957), I, 435: The New Testament knows only baptism in the name of Jesus… which still occurs even in the second and third centuries. Canneys Encyclopedia of Religions (1970), page 53: Persons were baptized at first in the name of Jesus Christ … or in the name of the Lord Jesus… Afterwards, with the development of the doctrine of the Trinity, they were baptized in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost. Encyclopedia Biblica (1899), I, 473: It is natural to conclude that baptism was administered in the earliest times in the name of Jesus Christ, or in that of the Lord Jesus. This view is confirmed by the fact that the earliest forms of the baptismal confession appear to have been single-not triple, as was the later creed. Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th ed. (1920), II 365: The trinitarian formula and trine immersion were not uniformly used from the beginning… Bapti[sm] into the name of the Lord [was] the normal formula of the New Testament. In the 3rd century baptism in the name of Christ was still so widespread that Pope Stephen, in opposition to Cyprian of Carthage, declared it to be valid. My advice to you is, if you arent affiliated with one now, that you find yourself a church which embraces, teaches and preaches the Apostles One God Monotheistic Doctrine and baptizes in the precious name of Jesus ... the name that was alluded to in Matthew 28:19 ... and go there, and see (and feel) the difference for yourself. John 5:39 Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me. 2 Timothy 2:15 Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. Wishing you Gods very best!
Posted on: Sun, 05 Oct 2014 11:02:22 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015