Is there any difference in policies if either wins? They both claim they will manage all the programs that have been failing for decades, better than they have been managed. Even though both have already been in the DC government for years. How will either end our decades long failed schools, that produce the highest truancy and absenteeism and the lowest proficiency and graduation rates in the nation, while spending over $29,000 per pupil in the public schools? (And separate and very unequally only $17,000 per pupil in the charter schools.) I imagine both would be less corrupt than all the corrupt politicians they served and worked with for years, whose perfidy the Post and most journalists were oblivious to (after all, they were all Democrats!), until private citizens like Tim Day began exposing it. But what difference would it make which is elected? Where do they differ on any significant issue? Mr. Catania says he will make sure if you could afford to buy an expensive home near one of the few good schools you will absolutely be guaranteed a seat for your child in that school. And if you are then shut out and trapped in a bad school he will spend even MORE than $29,000 per pupil supporting the layers of administrators in the Department of Education whose unions donate to candidates. And Ms. Boswer says she will instead....what?
Posted on: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 12:12:18 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015