It is 8:50 am,RP time.(Sat.),Aug. 10,2013..Please be informed about this topic... **Ten Reasons why Paul wasn"t referring to veils or garment covering for the head in 1 Cor.11:------ 1.Teaching women to wear veils over their hair ,that both are essential ,and that without a veil (although the hair is uncut),the head is not covered.,constitutes in contradiction to 1 Cor.11:15..and in effect establishes two coverings for the women,.. 2.Wearing a veil over cut hair would not constitute a biblical covering. 3.Veils,hats,shawls,etc. are not sinful if worn by a woman,however,they are not required by the scriptures. 4.If veil is an essential covering for the woman,she would be unable to pray or prophesy unless she had one on her head. 5.Veils,if required ,are essential when entering the supernatural realm...Your hair without a veil on top ,will suffice in the normal everyday affairs if such teachings in fact true. 6.Veils,if required ,supersede the natural covering of the uncut hair ,are superior to,and exceed hair as covering ,and become the medium through or by which God accepts/rejects prayers. 7.Does wearing a veil indicate submission ,or uncut hair ,on a woman?Hair does according to 1 Cor.11:15,kjv.. 8.If a material or a garment covering is the only covering referred to in 1 Cor 11,how then you can cut ,shear,have shorn or shave such? 9.Veils or a man-made garment of some type becomes a woman"s glory rather than her hair if they constitute a covering. 10.Teaching that veils are biblical covering for a woman promotes cutting the hair as natural covering...Flawed is such exegis of the scripture...
Posted on: Sat, 10 Aug 2013 01:02:00 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015