It might come as no surprise in light of the Paris shooting that we see the establishment propaganda machine go into overdrive and use the “Terror Threat” to once again call for a removal of our freedoms and rights and push us further down the path of a police state and eventual martial law. Like every other decent human being, we are repulsed at this needless slaughter and our condolences and sympathies go out to the family and friends of the victims. Almost within minutes of the event happening sharp eyed viewers were asking questions and wondering if this was yet another “false flag event” intent on sowing the seeds of divide. Regardless of what you believe, this was the murder of 12 innocent people, so when all the mainstream media share similar banner headlines, not about the victims who died, but about the “War on Freedom” and “Assault on Democracy” we see a familiar pattern begin to emerge that will be used to dupe the public into surrendering more of our rights and freedoms. The Westminster establishment was quick to produce one of it talking heads on state broadcaster the BBC, in the form of Sir Menzies Campbell. The news piece was about the Paris attack, yet Sir Menzies barely mentions the events unfolding, but rather goes on to spout what is clearly government propaganda aimed at more restrictions on everything we do. He is not asked any hard questions by the BBC journalist who lets him speak uninterrupted, and even agrees with him at one point. This is a sure sign we are being conditioned for even more restrictive laws under the guise of protecting society. You can watch the full interview below but here is our interpretation of the real purpose of the interview. Some of the giveaways of a propaganda psy-op… the talking heads will always express their insincere personal sorrow, will always make flattering statements about the courage and bravery of the general public and will almost in every case bring children into the equation. They will say the threat is greater and more imminent and will be carried out by home grown “lone wolves” ( an open ended term that they use to make us all suspects) and that we need more protection from the state but it will mean hard choices, more restrictions and less freedom. This is propaganda 101. Sir Menzies gets off to a flyer….. “Let’s look first of all at France, obviously these events have struck right at the heart of the French people”. Then goes on to mention how touched he was by the Australian tourists and then hits the bulls eye when he says ; “the poise and common sense of one of the children who said, “ These people are doing the kind of things that we wouldn’t do”. He cleverly mentions the “heart” of the French people to subconsciously provoke an emotional response rather than a critical thinking response and then ties it in with the Australians as a method to signify its an attack on the western world and thus all of us. He swiftly follows up with the children aspect to give the air of parental-esque concern and to once again target an emotional response. He then deftly plants the seed of division by the term “These people” uttered from the mouth of an innocent child, whilst at the same time implying we are the good guys and wouldn’t do such a thing, implying we have the moral high ground. Menzies, the fully paid up member of the establishment mouth piece, then switches it from an attack on France to an attack on the whole western world and its values. “This is not just an attack on France, it’s really an attack on the values of Europe, Values that are shared with North America and with other British and former British dominions or colonies”. So we are all in it together scenario! We are all in Imminent danger!…Again! Look back at the news feeds of every previous “terrorist attack”, the rhetoric is identical on all occasions. He then goes on to say; “Fact, If we are going to maintain fundamental principles of accountability and democracy, freedom of expression, then we have to be prepared to protect these, of course that raises quite difficult questions to the extent you have to limit freedom in order to preserve it” “Limit freedom in order to preserve it” This is dangerous talk, the same talk that was spouted by Blair and Bush. In other words surrender freedom for security. But a wise man, Benjamin Franklin once said “He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither”. This is a tried and tested trap to bring in more security checks, more camera’s, more surveillance, more ID Cards on the road to a Police State and they will fool the public into believing it. Of course they just passed the 2nd reading of the new Counter Terrorism and Security Bill yesterday as Sir Menzies confirms; “We had Counter terrorism legislation going through the House of Commons yesterday, tightening things up”. Tightening what “Things” up exactly, Sir Menzies?. Some of the things included in this bill includes, encouraging spying on each other and reporting your suspicions to the authorities. Hold on a minute, did the Gestapo not use these tactics in Nazi Germany? the Communists in Russia and China? the Stasi in East Germany? Some of the “things” included in the bill include…. • Passport seizure and retention powers which are ripe for discrimination (just like the section 44 stop and search without suspicion powers repealed by the Coalition) and will divert attention from the police’s powers of arrest; • A regime of exclusion orders which risks exposing British citizens to torture or delivering them into the hands of terror factions; • Statutory terrorism prevention duties for a whole range of public bodies, including Universities and schools, embroiling professionals such as lecturers and teachers in counter-terror policing – risking mistrust and alienation; • A provision which will remove the requirement for a warrant for the interception of all post sent from, and received in, the UK; • New data retention powers mirroring the blanket powers sought under the Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act – as rejected by the European Court of Justice; • Provisions which seek to breathe new life into the widely-discredited TPIMs regime, which has consistently failed to tackle serious criminality through a system of civil restrictions; • Provision for the creation of new “authority-to-carry” schemes – allowing the Home Secretary to refuse authority to whole categories of passengers, on grounds as crude as nationality; Sir Menzies further states; “The inclination towards a restriction is necessary as circumstances change that, balance I was talking about can never always be the same because as the threat rises, you have to reflect that in the kind of precautions you take”. In other words, for every alleged “Terrorist Attack” real or false, we will continue to bring in even more restrictions. Of course sleekit Menzies is alluding to the fact that the threat will continue to rise and therefore more restrictions will be needed, in other words expect the never ending war on terrorism. Smells a lot like 1984 don’t you think? This can only lead to one thing…Martial Law! By adding more and more restrictions on the population bit by bit you reach martial law by default before the people realise what is happening. Its called the “boiling frogs syndrome”. To further induce fear and anxiety Sir Menzies goes on to discuss; The threat level has been raised to its second lowest, suggests it should be at full alert. What is this mythical threat-o- meter? How does it know when terrorists are going to strike? It is nothing more than a stupid and worthless piece of circus to fool the masses into fear and anxiety by ramping it up and down at will. It case you have not noticed, it tends to get ramped up when the government feels under threat from the general public to their misdeeds and was raised in September during the Scottish independence referendum when the Yes campaign looked like winning. “No such thing as absolute security, you can’t provide a policeman or an armoured car for every citizen. You have to find a mechanism to reduce to the greatest possible extent any outrage like the one we are discussing” So the police and the military can’t provide absolute security, so you will bring in “mechanisms” to reduce terrorism. The only way you can do that Menzies is to treat everyone as a suspect until proven innocent, or turn everyone into state spies or collaborators or put everybody in “concentration camps”, commonly known as FEMA camps in the USA. Or is there something else you’re not telling us, Ming the Merceless? In order to ramp up the fear and to further point the finger at Muslims, establishment flunkey Sir Menzies raises the usual bogeymen, ISIS being their latest, and alleged rogue states, Syria and Iraq. Not to mention the terrorists are returning to Britain to kill us all. He rounds this off by suggesting that the governments new Counter Terrorism and Security Bill is actually there to “protect” us. Honestly you could not make this stuff up! We are then neatly reminded of the “home grown” terror as he mentions the Lee Rigby killing, further suggesting our streets are crawling with terrorists, and by the way, these ones were only amateurs compared to the “New Improved” highly drilled, highly effective, totally confident “terrorists” we saw in Paris. According to Sir Ming the Wise, this will “inevitably” raise the threat. So we can definitely count on more terrorist attacks as guaranteed by Sir Menzies on behalf of the establishment. Finally, Sir Menzies concludes “Precautions have got to be better and higher and they have also got to be more resolute, so we must be willing to take immediate (unacceptable…. fraudulent slip?) in ordinary circumstances unacceptable steps to deal with it”. In other words, the establishment want to be able to get away with anything they want without having to seek the public’s consent first and if the public speak up against it, then they will be with the terrorists and not with the establishment. This my friends, is called Dictatorship! So if we let the Westminster establishment have their way, it will not be long before alternative media sites promoting independence, or criticizing the government in any way, and the people who own and write for the alternative media will be classed as a “terror threat”. History proves that all empires kill and murder or imprison all the critical and free thinkers within its society. If Scotland does not break free from this criminal cabal in Westminster soon, Scotland will become no more than an open prison under the pretext it is to protect us from the terrorist YES supporters, after all, the biggest threat to the establishment is not Muslim terrorists, but independent minded and critically thinking Scots who have the power to bring down this house of cards
Posted on: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 21:42:07 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015