It turns out that with the increasingly nanny state restrictions being placed on recreational fishers in Ontario waters (eg. black bass closed season from November to June despite neighbouring jurisdictions having year-round open seasons, year-round lake sturgeon season closure) all while raising their fishing licence fees accompanied by the closure of MNR hatcheries only points to one direction: The Fiberals are attempting to use these nanny state regulations under the surmise of conservation in order to blatantly confiscate honest recreational fishers property and money and redistribute it to their public sector Conservation Officers and unions rather than using it for what the money was originally intended for (fish stocking, research and public outreach and education). All species that the Fiberals are trying to convince anglers are threatened (black basses, walleye, lake sturgeon, northern pike and muskellunge, etc.) and therefore need to have an unreasonably lengthly closed season or an outright ban on fishing are listed as species of least concern by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) and are under no threat of extirpation. In neighbouring jurisdictions such as the US side of the Great Lakes, the NOAA Office of Fisheries Enforcement allows for year-round fishing of the very species the Fiberals are trying to even prevent us from practising catch and release fishing on. If the Fiberal propaganda was correct, then wouldnt these threatened species be extirpated throughout any American jurisdiction that doesnt institute a closed season on them?
Posted on: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 02:49:50 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015