Its an assumption about atmospheric carbon 14 levels in the past. The current radio carbon dating assumes a constant atmospheric carbon model that is the same condition as today, when we know that this level is fluctuating.. Evolutionists rebut that there are many other dating methods used in parallel with this, that dont have the same flaw.. Although, that statement itself admits the same flaw. The problem with models, is that it always assumes the prehistoric conditions of all earth, life and Cosmo systems.. Ive been working in state of the art aircraft design prototype manufacturing for years, with tons of engineers that design purely in models, then materialize the design. And the most common phrase I hear from engineers during prototype build is, well, that doesnt look like the model ..and they have to go back and change the model to match reality. Models are never perfect to reality, and if an aircraft isnt perfect for current applications that CAN be tested- then how much more inaccurate are models for prehistoric models that CANT be tested? This is the dilemma. - Blaine Bowden
Posted on: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 17:41:41 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015