Its an interesting case but frankly it seems like Darlies - TopicsExpress



          

Its an interesting case but frankly it seems like Darlies supporters (the Darlie-ites, lol) are increasingly moving away from the trial evidence to support their conclusions. As time goes by the Darlie-ites seem to be using a faith based defense which relies upon declaring Darlie innocent based on vague psychological claims such as Darlie loved herself too much to ever cut her own body, etc. ...or I know Darlie couldnt have done that because she was a loving mother, etc. LOL. For example, at PollyannaLannas blog she literally declares Darlie innocent based on the fact that she believes Darlie couldnt do that to herself (as though she knows Darlies innermost secrets from 1996). She also believes Darin is guilty and wants him in prison (yes, she would put him in prison if she had the power) even though theres no evidence to support that verdict other than speculation and gossip from the Darlie-ites. Most Darlie-ites also believe that the state of Texas judicial system exists for the sole purpose of framing innocent people. Once an emotional bond develops (once a person becomes a Darlie-ite) all trial evidence is declared corrupt unless it supports Darlie (lol). Its a common trend Ive noticed. All trial evidence is replaced with talking points taken directly from Darlies web site. These talking points ignore the volumes of trial facts which work against Darlie. Then we get articles and blog posts which arent even remotely based on the totality of trial evidence (including Darlies horrible testimony on the witness stand where she was caught lying numerous times; something which her supporters never want to talk about). Her supporters dont even know what Darlie said on the witness stand nor do they care. They dont care about anything which might implicate Darlie. Its called the ostrich syndrome. If it doesnt support Darlies innocence its just corrupt evidence or unreliable evidence. If you want to read some facts on this case you should read posts made by Pamela Collins at various Internet blogs. Shes an expert on the actual trial evidence (not gossip).
Posted on: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 19:54:26 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015