Jay Inslee has willingly and knowingly violated his oath of office by signing into law something the violates the 2nd amendment of the United States Constutution and Article 1 Section 24 of the Washington State Constitution. This new law also interferes with a persons right to due process by imposing penalties for a crime that has not yet been proven. This is dangerous ground when we live in a world full of false accusations. Somebody smarter than me needs to draft the petition and get it going so we can get this guy out of office and find somebody who will represent the people rather than chipping away at our rights one piece at a time! RCW 29A.56.110 Initiating proceedings — Statement — Contents — Verification — Definitions. Whenever any legal voter of the state or of any political subdivision thereof, either individually or on behalf of an organization, desires to demand the recall and discharge of any elective public officer of the state or of such political subdivision, as the case may be, under the provisions of sections 33 and 34 of Article 1 of the Constitution, the voter shall prepare a typewritten charge, reciting that such officer, naming him or her and giving the title of the office, has committed an act or acts of malfeasance, or an act or acts of misfeasance while in office, or has violated the oath of office, or has been guilty of any two or more of the acts specified in the Constitution as grounds for recall. The charge shall state the act or acts complained of in concise language, give a detailed description including the approximate date, location, and nature of each act complained of, be signed by the person or persons making the charge, give their respective post office addresses, and be verified under oath that the person or persons believe the charge or charges to be true and have knowledge of the alleged facts upon which the stated grounds for recall are based. For the purposes of this chapter: (1) Misfeasance or malfeasance in office means any wrongful conduct that affects, interrupts, or interferes with the performance of official duty; (a) Additionally, misfeasance in office means the performance of a duty in an improper manner; and (b) Additionally, malfeasance in office means the commission of an unlawful act; (2) Violation of the oath of office means the neglect or knowing failure by an elective public officer to perform faithfully a duty imposed by law. [2003 c 111 § 1407; 1984 c 170 § 1; 1975-76 2nd ex.s. c 47 § 1; 1965 c 9 § 29.82.010. Prior: 1913 c 146 § 1; RRS § 5350. Former part of section: 1913 c 146 § 2; RRS § 5351, now codified in RCW 29.82.015. Formerly RCW 29.82.010.] Notes: Severability -- 1975-76 2nd ex.s. c 47: If any provision of this amendatory act, or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act, or the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances is not affected. [1975-76 2nd ex.s. c 47 § 3.]
Posted on: Sun, 30 Mar 2014 15:11:59 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015