Just had a long talk with a man claiming to be D/SGT Gary Green of the Michigan State Police. Gary, although our conversation went into every area of nearly all my allegations over the last four years, claimed to be investigating allegations now from Melody Lake, (Office of DHS in Isabella County, Michigan) with regard to the claim she makes in the video below that I had allegedly threatened her. When asked the specifics of the threat he stated that he didnt really know other than she felt threatened. I knew this would be coming since the video came out because she had publicly and openly made the allegations against me and now has to defend her actions by registering a complaint against me in preparation and posturing to defend against a Slander & Libel suit against herself and potentially others. Had I actually threatened her, she would have made a complaint at the supposed time I allegedly threatened her and not nearly a month later after listening to herself in the video below. Gary went so far as to ask me to come into the police post and I politely declined advising him that our conversation over the phone was as far as I was willing to go in offering him extra judicial testimony. He told me that the conversation between myself and Melody Lake had not been recorded by Melody and that it was her word against mine and that it would be up to a prosecutor to determine if there was probable cause to issue warrant. LOL In addition to this, Gary and I talked about nearly everything else including the following; 1. The kidnapping of Dani Austins three children 2. Paul Chamberlain ordering armed men to steal my personal property and that I had a court transcript as proof. 3. My assumption of the vacant de jure seat of sheriff 4. The Unlawful Posting complaint against me which he claimed was now closed by special prosecutor from Claire county 5. My gun board 6. The false state police report by fellow officer Jerry Carter naming me a VOLATILE PERSON. 7. The posting of my picture and private information about me in Public Spaces of Isabella county 8. The fact that with all of my allegations, police reports are only created about me and not for me 9. The posting I did about the dangers police face for denying redress to the people. In this part of the conversation, my posting was taken completely out of context and stated in a manner that for sure would have got me arrested on the spot! 10. The fact that he, Gary Green purported to and led me to believe that he was a federal agent as discussed in the complaint against me numbered 041-0000457-11. 11. The fact that he and two federal agents entered my home without warrant to which he stated so why didnt you ask us to leave? 12. Melody Lakes letter to Dani Austins attorney read to us over the phone yesterday where Melody Lake claims that I have a propensity for violence which is totally unfounded slander and libel as well as scandalous. 13. My streaming video home security system 14. Gary claimed that he was a big fan of mine? 15. Gary told me that he got Shelly Sweet on other unrelated stuff without expounding and claims responsibility for Shelly Sweet getting fired from the sheriff department and that he couldnt understand why she wasnt fired for her actions against my family in 2010 as if I were supposed to be grateful or something... 16. etc etc Gary commented on my writing style and I told him that my writing and style were intended to help keep me safe and he seemed to understand. Gary went on to say that he was worried that someone that reads about what Isabella County and the Michigan State Police and those alleged officials have done to myself and my family and takes it upon him/herself to act out violently. I said that is unfortunately a very valid concern but that I had nothing to do with creating the environment and that this environment was created by our alleged officials by refusing the people the right to redress which is a right secured to the people in the 1st amendment! I expounded on this significantly for Gary. I told him that the courts and the police can NOT continue to take away the peoples right to redress without expecting things to break and that if the people have nowhere to go what-so-ever, some may resort to undesirable methods for redress and that this is inevitable and I had nothing to do with it. I explained that if the police continue to break the law and are shown to never be held accountable for their actions that this can and will be seen by the public as the ultimate and total violation of the Public Trust and something that is completely intolerable. I said to Gary, you have just now heard the bulk of my complaints and you have not offered to lift a finger to help me, to write a police report or anything to which he replied, all my bosses are aware of your complaints and have determined them to not be worthy of presentment to a prosecutor and I said, SO NOW YOU SEE MY POINT? I assured Gary Green, if in fact that was who I was talking to, that I am not at all interested in any violence and that I too am very concerned for the safety of our police just as I am concerned for we the people. Gary then asked... What would you have me do? to which I responded, what would your oath have you do? All police MUST UNDERSTAND that redress will be had and that if the police and the courts are going to deny it, it will be had elsewhere. This is really important! YOU HAVE TO BE A COMPLETE MORON TO NOT UNDERSTAND THE IMPORTANCE OF THE ABILITY TO SEEK REDRESS! ITS IN THE FIRST F-ING AMENDMENT IT IS SO IMPORTANT TO WE THE PEOPLE! Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. All police MUST UNDERSTAND that the situation today can NOT be fixed non-violently by the people and that non-violent resolution must come from them by doing their job and being accountable to the same law as everyone else and that the police and the courts are doing the police ZERO favors by refusing to prosecute the criminal acts of police and judicial officers. If we the people are forced into attempting to fix the intentional denial of redress by police and the courts, logic dictates that this can only be accomplished through the use of force equal to or greater than that applied by the courts and the police. How many times can the people be expected to get shot in the face with mace trying to be peaceful before alternative methods become preferable? So we concluded our conversation with a request for me to scan and email the court transcript where Paul Chamberlain ordered armed men to steal property from me and I told him that I would. Gary, if you recorded this conversation I would really like to have a copy of it! I promise that I will not use it against you for admitting you entered my home without warrant even though that would have been exactly why you were with the federal agents to begin with... To assure Constitutional behavior.
Posted on: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 20:02:47 +0000
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015