Ladies and Gentlemen, Mitt Romney and Jeb Bush - not to mention other of the possible presidential aspirants such as Dr. Benjamin Carson, Paul Ryan, Rand Paul, Marco Rubio, Chris Cristie, and Rick Santorum, are not fighters; politicians aligned with the Progressive RINO Establishment are Milquetoasts by nature - users and operators, power-brokers, deal-makers, and ladder-climbers - believing not in the Declaration and the Constitution, but their anointed vision of big government as the cure rather than the problem: a view shared by all progressives. For that reason - among others - they win even when they lose. A bit of honest research into their records will illustrate how and why. The money and power will flow to Hillary; it is already happening. We live in a Twitter universe, immersed in a mass media culture. When it comes to presidential campaigns, the Progressive Marxist Chicago mafia of the New Democrat Party play chess, while the Progressive RINO Establishment play checkers...and become wealthy. This concept is most challenging for the Republican Party loyalists, as I wrote in Times to Try Our Souls: If conservatives are too intimidated or in some way remain too unmotivated after the advent of King Barry-care to band together around the Constitution and soundly beat back the Progressive RINO Establishment—the ruling class and their political class operatives—in 2014, America will endure another Romney/McCain/Bush Dynasty/Dole/Ford/Nixon elitist insider crammed down our throats by big money crony capitalists, and the establishment “Republican” nominee will lose to Hillary in 2016. Scream if you must, it won’t make a predictable outcome any less true. Or you can begin to fight. The Progressive RINO Establishment simply can not out-pander, out-lie, out-cheat, nor strategically out-think the Chicago Democrat machine; sorry, it just isn’t going to happen. When Constitutional Conservatism is factually and coherently articulated, media mouthpieces loose sway; Republicans with a well-defined choice between liberty and tyranny will invariably turn out in record numbers—as will blue collar voters tied to the Democrat Party—to vote for liberty over tyranny out of self-interests. Why did 3-plus million Republicans and millions more Democrats stay home rather than vote for Mitt? To be perfectly blunt, it is because Mitt is a Progressive, not a Constitutional Conservative; precisely why King Barry worked with utmost diligence to ensure Mitt would address the GOP in Tampa as the nominee. It was no accident the bulk of media was heaping unabashed praise upon Mitt until he was officially nominated; after that, it was Katy bar the door. Mitt appears a decent enough guy, probably convinced he knows how to best regulate our lives; yet he was uninspiring and lacked distinction in many respects for far too many Americans: a concern among conservatives during the 2012 election. King Barry desperately needed Mitt: an affluent, culturally privileged candidate with big government proclivities similar to his own; a perfect foil for his Progressive Marxist class warfare rhetoric, more of which we may expect from the Democrats during 2014 under the guise of “income inequality.” His wrecking-ball presidency could have been itemized and exposed if only it had been contrasted with substantiated fact and aggressively compared with what is constitutionally permissible versus Mitt’s timid, generic, inconsistent, apologetic, unremarkable and dispassionately elitist boilerplate Pablum. The sad and painful truth must be understood to keep from repeating another catastrophic Progressive RINO elitist disaster: Mitt ushered in King Barry’s second term by practicing the same progressive big government arrogance of thought with which Bush 43 ushered in King Barry’s first term. Mitt could neither defend nor define constitutional conservatism anymore than could Bush 43 or 41. Coolidge and Reagan defended and defined constitutional conservatism: the results are obvious, and speak volumes. Hillary knows what she believes and knows how to fight, as does a certain Gov. from Alaska; the difference being the Gov. from Alaska not only tells the truth consistently, but will fight for the America of our Founders and Framers, as did Reagan and Coolidge. Reagan and Coolidge won landslide election victories because they were both constitutional conservatives able to communicate the importance of our founding documents to the American electorate. The Gov. from Alaska - Sarah Palin - does the same thing, and has the track record and political experience to back it up should one be curious enough to think for themselves by boldly pursuing the truth. canadafreepress/index.php/article/60224
Posted on: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 02:10:22 +0000